IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v82y2014i2p275-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Unifying Framework for Marginalised Random-Intercept Models of Correlated Binary Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce J. Swihart
  • Brian S. Caffo
  • Ciprian M. Crainiceanu

Abstract

xml:lang="fr" type="main"> Nous démontrons que de nombreuses approches actuelles pour la modélisation marginale d'observations binaires conduisent à des vraisemblances correspondant à des modèles de copules. Ces copules fournissent des modèles pour l'estimation d'effets fixes marginaux et l'interprétation de structures de corrélation échangeables. En outre, nous proposons une nomenclature qui éclaire considérablement le domaine complexe des modèles à coefficients à l'origine aléatoires pour données binaires. Une collection variée d'exemples mathématiques et numériques viennent illustrer ces concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce J. Swihart & Brian S. Caffo & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu, 2014. "A Unifying Framework for Marginalised Random-Intercept Models of Correlated Binary Outcomes," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 275-295, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:82:y:2014:i:2:p:275-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/insr.12035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Rao Chaganty & Harry Joe, 2006. "Range of correlation matrices for dependent Bernoulli random variables," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(1), pages 197-206, March.
    2. Yan, Jun, 2007. "Enjoy the Joy of Copulas: With a Package copula," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 21(i04).
    3. N. Rao Chaganty & Harry Joe, 2004. "Efficiency of generalized estimating equations for binary responses," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 851-860, November.
    4. Zengri Wang, 2003. "Matching conditional and marginal shapes in binary random intercept models using a bridge distribution function," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(4), pages 765-775, December.
    5. Joe, Harry, 2005. "Asymptotic efficiency of the two-stage estimation method for copula-based models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 401-419, June.
    6. Klaus Larsen & Jørgen Holm Petersen & Esben Budtz-Jørgensen & Lars Endahl, 2000. "Interpreting Parameters in the Logistic Regression Model with Random Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 909-914, September.
    7. Patrick J. Heagerty, 1999. "Marginally Specified Logistic-Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 688-698, September.
    8. Daniel Berg, 2009. "Copula goodness-of-fit testing: an overview and power comparison," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7-8), pages 675-701.
    9. Nikoloulopoulos, Aristidis K. & Karlis, Dimitris, 2008. "Copula model evaluation based on parametric bootstrap," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 3342-3353, March.
    10. Beunckens, Caroline & Sotto, Cristina & Molenberghs, Geert, 2008. "A simulation study comparing weighted estimating equations with multiple imputation based estimating equations for longitudinal binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1533-1548, January.
    11. Chandra Bhat & Ipek Sener, 2009. "A copula-based closed-form binary logit choice model for accommodating spatial correlation across observational units," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 243-272, September.
    12. Lanjia Lin & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Stuart R. Lipsitz & Debajyoti Sinha, 2010. "Association Models for Clustered Data with Binary and Continuous Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 287-293, March.
    13. Caffo, Brian & An, Ming-Wen & Rohde, Charles, 2007. "Flexible random intercept models for binary outcomes using mixtures of normals," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5220-5235, July.
    14. Agresti, Alan & Caffo, Brian & Ohman-Strickland, Pamela, 2004. "Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 639-653, October.
    15. Xiaoyun Li & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Stuart Lipsitz & Debajyoti Sinha, 2011. "Likelihood Methods for Binary Responses of Present Components in a Cluster," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 629-635, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iraj Kazemi & Fatemeh Hassanzadeh, 2021. "Marginalized random-effects models for clustered binomial data through innovative link functions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(2), pages 197-228, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nooraee, Nazanin & Molenberghs, Geert & van den Heuvel, Edwin R., 2014. "GEE for longitudinal ordinal data: Comparing R-geepack, R-multgee, R-repolr, SAS-GENMOD, SPSS-GENLIN," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-83.
    2. Laura Boehm & Brian J. Reich & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2013. "Bridging Conditional and Marginal Inference for Spatially Referenced Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 545-554, June.
    3. Iraj Kazemi & Fatemeh Hassanzadeh, 2021. "Marginalized random-effects models for clustered binomial data through innovative link functions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(2), pages 197-228, June.
    4. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2017. "Random-intercept misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary responses," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(3), pages 333-359, August.
    5. Huang, Youjun & Pan, Jianxin, 2021. "Joint generalized estimating equations for longitudinal binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Wanling Huang & Artem Prokhorov, 2014. "A Goodness-of-fit Test for Copulas," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 751-771, October.
    7. Iddi Samuel & Nwoko Esther O., 2017. "Effect of covariate misspecifications in the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 111-120, June.
    8. Brechmann Eike Christain & Czado Claudia, 2013. "Risk management with high-dimensional vine copulas: An analysis of the Euro Stoxx 50," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 30(4), pages 307-342, December.
    9. Francesco BARTOLUCCI & Silvia BACCI & Claudia PIGINI, 2015. "A Misspecification Test for Finite-Mixture Logistic Models for Clustered Binary and Ordered Responses," Working Papers 410, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    10. Aristidis Nikoloulopoulos & Dimitris Karlis, 2010. "Regression in a copula model for bivariate count data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 1555-1568.
    11. Jason Roy & Michael J. Daniels, 2008. "A General Class of Pattern Mixture Models for Nonignorable Dropout with Many Possible Dropout Times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 538-545, June.
    12. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2019. "Link misspecification in generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for binary responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 827-843, September.
    13. Deng, Yihao & Sabo, Roy T. & Chaganty, N. Rao, 2012. "Multivariate probit analysis of binary familial data using stochastic representations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 656-663.
    14. Fontana, Roberto & Semeraro, Patrizia, 2018. "Representation of multivariate Bernoulli distributions with a given set of specified moments," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 290-303.
    15. Hobæk Haff, Ingrid, 2012. "Comparison of estimators for pair-copula constructions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 91-105.
    16. Bhat, Chandra R. & Sener, Ipek N. & Eluru, Naveen, 2010. "A flexible spatially dependent discrete choice model: Formulation and application to teenagers' weekday recreational activity participation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 903-921, September.
    17. Jonathan S. Schildcrout & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2007. "Marginalized Models for Moderate to Long Series of Longitudinal Binary Response Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 322-331, June.
    18. Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos & Peter G. Moffatt, 2019. "Coupling Couples With Copulas: Analysis Of Assortative Matching On Risk Attitude," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 654-666, January.
    19. Leh-Chyan So & Jun-Yang Yu, 2015. "IMPROVED DETECTION OF RARE-EVENT RISK OF A PORTFOLIO WITH U.S. REITs," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Caffo, Brian & An, Ming-Wen & Rohde, Charles, 2007. "Flexible random intercept models for binary outcomes using mixtures of normals," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5220-5235, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:82:y:2014:i:2:p:275-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.