IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/mcmeap/v23y2017i2p111-120n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of covariate misspecifications in the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model

Author

Listed:
  • Iddi Samuel

    (Department of Statistics, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG115, Legon, Ghana)

  • Nwoko Esther O.

    (Department of Statistics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa)

Abstract

Count outcomes are often modelled using the Poisson regression. However, this model imposes a strict mean-variance relationship that is unappealing in many contexts. Several studies in the life sciences result in count outcomes with excessive amounts of zeros. The presence of the excess zeros introduces extra dispersion in the data which cannot be accounted for by the traditional Poisson regression. The zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) and zero-inflated negative binomial models are popular alternative. The zero-inflated models comprise two key components; a logistic part which models the zeros, and a Poisson component to handle the positive counts. Both components allow the inclusion of covariates. Civettini and Hines [3] investigated misspecification effects in the zero-inflated negative binomial regression models. Long,Preisser, Herring and Golin [10] proposed a so-called marginalized zero-inflated Poisson (MZIP) model that allows direct marginal interpretation for fixed effect estimates to overcome the often sub-population specific interpretation of the traditional zero-inflated models. In this research, the effects of misspecification of components of the MZIP regression model are investigated through a comprehensive simulation study. Two different incorrect specifications of the components of an MZIP model were considered, namely ‘Omission’ and ‘Misspecification’. Bias, standard error (precision) of estimates and mean square error (MSE) are computed while varying the sample size. Type I error rates are also evaluated for the misspecified models. Results of a Monte Carlo simulation are reported. It was observed that omissions in both parts of the models lead to biases in the estimated parameters. The intercept parameters were the most severely affected. Furthermore, in all the types of omissions, parameters in the zero-inflated part of the models were much affected compared to the Poisson part in terms of both bias and MSE. Generally, bias and MSE decrease as sample sizes increase for all parameters. It was also found that misspecification can either increase, preserve or decrease the type I error rates depending on the sample size.

Suggested Citation

  • Iddi Samuel & Nwoko Esther O., 2017. "Effect of covariate misspecifications in the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 111-120, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:23:y:2017:i:2:p:111-120:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/mcma-2017-0106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma-2017-0106
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mcma-2017-0106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iddi, Samuel & Molenberghs, Geert, 2012. "A combined overdispersed and marginalized multilevel model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1944-1951.
    2. Patrick J. Heagerty, 1999. "Marginally Specified Logistic-Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 688-698, September.
    3. Agresti, Alan & Caffo, Brian & Ohman-Strickland, Pamela, 2004. "Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 639-653, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco BARTOLUCCI & Silvia BACCI & Claudia PIGINI, 2015. "A Misspecification Test for Finite-Mixture Logistic Models for Clustered Binary and Ordered Responses," Working Papers 410, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    2. Tanya P. Garcia & Yanyuan Ma, 2016. "Optimal Estimator for Logistic Model with Distribution-free Random Intercept," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 156-171, March.
    3. Iraj Kazemi & Fatemeh Hassanzadeh, 2021. "Marginalized random-effects models for clustered binomial data through innovative link functions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(2), pages 197-228, June.
    4. Bruce J. Swihart & Brian S. Caffo & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu, 2014. "A Unifying Framework for Marginalised Random-Intercept Models of Correlated Binary Outcomes," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 275-295, August.
    5. Özgür Asar & Ozlem Ilk, 2016. "First-order marginalised transition random effects models with probit link function," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 925-942, April.
    6. Bartolucci, Francesco & Bacci, Silvia & Pigini, Claudia, 2017. "Misspecification test for random effects in generalized linear finite-mixture models for clustered binary and ordered data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 112-131.
    7. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    8. J. E. Mills & C. A. Field & D. J. Dupuis, 2002. "Marginally Specified Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Robust Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 727-734, December.
    9. Jason Roy & Michael J. Daniels, 2008. "A General Class of Pattern Mixture Models for Nonignorable Dropout with Many Possible Dropout Times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 538-545, June.
    10. Fei Jiang & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 112-129, March.
    11. Huang, Xianzheng, 2011. "Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 703-714, January.
    12. Yingye Zheng & Patrick J. Heagerty & Li Hsu & Polly A. Newcomb, 2010. "On Combining Family-Based and Population-Based Case–Control Data in Association Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1024-1033, December.
    13. Kenneth J. Wilkins & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, 2006. "A Hybrid Model for Nonignorable Dropout in Longitudinal Binary Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 168-176, March.
    14. Yu, Lei & Tyas, Suzanne L. & Snowdon, David A. & Kryscio, Richard J., 2009. "Effects of ignoring baseline on modeling transitions from intact cognition to dementia," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3334-3343, July.
    15. Francis K. C. Hui & Samuel Müller & Alan H. Welsh, 2021. "Random Effects Misspecification Can Have Severe Consequences for Random Effects Inference in Linear Mixed Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 186-206, April.
    16. Jonathan S. Schildcrout & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2007. "Marginalized Models for Moderate to Long Series of Longitudinal Binary Response Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 322-331, June.
    17. Miran A. Jaffa & Ayad A. Jaffa, 2019. "A Likelihood-Based Approach with Shared Latent Random Parameters for the Longitudinal Binary and Informative Censoring Processes," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(3), pages 597-613, December.
    18. Axel Munk & Tatyana Krivobokova, 2009. "Comments on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 256-259, August.
    19. Samuel Iddi & Geert Molenberghs, 2012. "A joint marginalized multilevel model for longitudinal outcomes," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(11), pages 2413-2430, July.
    20. Raymond J. Carroll, 2003. "Variances Are Not Always Nuisance Parameters," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 211-220, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:23:y:2017:i:2:p:111-120:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.