IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v11y2019i3d10.1007_s12561-019-09254-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Likelihood-Based Approach with Shared Latent Random Parameters for the Longitudinal Binary and Informative Censoring Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Miran A. Jaffa

    (American University of Beirut)

  • Ayad A. Jaffa

    (American University of Beirut
    Medical University of South Carolina)

Abstract

Longitudinal studies with binary outcomes characterized by informative right censoring are commonly encountered in clinical, basic, behavioral, and health sciences. Approaches developed to analyze data with binary outcomes were mainly tailored to clustered or longitudinal data with missing completely at random or at random. Studies that focused on informative right censoring with binary outcomes are characterized by their imbedded computational complexity and difficulty of implementation. Here we present a new maximum likelihood-based approach with repeated binary measures modeled in a generalized linear mixed model as a function of time and other covariates. The longitudinal binary outcome and the censoring process determined by the number of times a subject is observed share latent random variables (random intercept and slope) where these subject-specific random effects are common to both models. A simulation study and sensitivity analysis were conducted to test the model under different assumptions and censoring settings. Our results showed accuracy of the estimates generated under this model when censoring was fully informative or partially informative with dependence on the slopes. A successful implementation was undertaken on a cohort of renal transplant patients with blood urea nitrogen as a binary outcome measured over time to indicate normal and abnormal kidney function until the emanation of graft rejection that eventuated in informative right censoring. In addition to its novelty and accuracy, an additional key feature and advantage of the proposed model is its viability of implementation on available analytical tools and widespread application on any other longitudinal dataset with informative censoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Miran A. Jaffa & Ayad A. Jaffa, 2019. "A Likelihood-Based Approach with Shared Latent Random Parameters for the Longitudinal Binary and Informative Censoring Processes," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(3), pages 597-613, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:11:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12561-019-09254-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-019-09254-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-019-09254-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-019-09254-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel O. Scharfstein, 2002. "Estimation of the failure time distribution in the presence of informative censoring," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(3), pages 617-634, August.
    2. P. Diggle & M. G. Kenward, 1994. "Informative Drop‐Out in Longitudinal Data Analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 43(1), pages 49-73, March.
    3. Jason Roy & Michael J. Daniels, 2008. "A General Class of Pattern Mixture Models for Nonignorable Dropout with Many Possible Dropout Times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 538-545, June.
    4. Daniel Scharfstein & James M. Robins & Wesley Eddings & Andrea Rotnitzky, 2001. "Inference in Randomized Studies with Informative Censoring and Discrete Time-to-Event Endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 404-413, June.
    5. Patrick J. Heagerty, 1999. "Marginally Specified Logistic-Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 688-698, September.
    6. Qiuju Li & Li Su, 2018. "Accommodating informative dropout and death: a joint modelling approach for longitudinal and semicompeting risks data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(1), pages 145-163, January.
    7. Rotnitzky Andrea & Daniel Scharfstein & Ting‐Li Su & James Robins, 2001. "Methods for Conducting Sensitivity Analysis of Trials with Potentially Nonignorable Competing Causes of Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 103-113, March.
    8. Jolene Birmingham & Andrea Rotnitzky & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, 2003. "Pattern–mixture and selection models for analysing longitudinal data with monotone missing patterns," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 275-297, February.
    9. Paul S. Albert & Dean A. Follmann & Shaohua A. Wang & Edward B. Suh, 2002. "A Latent Autoregressive Model for Longitudinal Binary Data Subject to Informative Missingness," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 631-642, September.
    10. Dimitris Rizopoulos & Geert Verbeke & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Yves Vanrenterghem, 2008. "A Two-Part Joint Model for the Analysis of Survival and Longitudinal Binary Data with Excess Zeros," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 611-619, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sedigheh Mirzaei Salehabadi & Debasis Sengupta & Rituparna Das, 2015. "Parametric Estimation of Menarcheal Age Distribution Based on Recall Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 290-305, March.
    2. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2022. "The Role of Conditional Likelihoods in Latent Variable Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 799-834, September.
    3. Yu Cao & Nitai D. Mukhopadhyay, 2021. "Statistical Modeling of Longitudinal Data with Non-Ignorable Non-Monotone Missingness with Semiparametric Bayesian and Machine Learning Components," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 152-169, May.
    4. Xuelin Huang & Nan Zhang, 2008. "Regression Survival Analysis with an Assumed Copula for Dependent Censoring: A Sensitivity Analysis Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1090-1099, December.
    5. Shu Yang & Yilong Zhang & Guanghan Frank Liu & Qian Guan, 2023. "SMIM: A unified framework of survival sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation and martingale," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 230-240, March.
    6. Díaz Iván & van der Laan Mark J., 2013. "Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference under Unmeasured Confounding and Measurement Error Problems," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 149-160, November.
    7. Joseph W. Hogan & Xihong Lin & Benjamin Herman, 2004. "Mixtures of Varying Coefficient Models for Longitudinal Data with Discrete or Continuous Nonignorable Dropout," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 854-864, December.
    8. David M. Murray & Jonathan L. Blitstein, 2003. "Methods To Reduce The Impact Of Intraclass Correlation In Group-Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 27(1), pages 79-103, February.
    9. Patrick E. B. FitzGerald, 2002. "Extended Generalized Estimating Equations for Binary Familial Data with Incomplete Families," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 718-726, December.
    10. Richard J. Cook & Jerald F. Lawless, 2020. "Failure time studies with intermittent observation and losses to follow‐up," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1035-1063, December.
    11. Heng Chen & Daniel F. Heitjan, 2022. "Analysis of local sensitivity to nonignorability with missing outcomes and predictors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1342-1352, December.
    12. Pourahmadi, Mohsen & Daniels, Michael J. & Park, Trevor, 2007. "Simultaneous modelling of the Cholesky decomposition of several covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 568-587, March.
    13. Iddi Samuel & Nwoko Esther O., 2017. "Effect of covariate misspecifications in the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 111-120, June.
    14. Sinha, Sanjoy K. & Kaushal, Amit & Xiao, Wenzhong, 2014. "Inference for longitudinal data with nonignorable nonmonotone missing responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 77-91.
    15. E. Michael Foster & Grace Y. Fang, 2004. "Alternative Methods for Handling Attrition," Evaluation Review, , vol. 28(5), pages 434-464, October.
    16. Francesco BARTOLUCCI & Silvia BACCI & Claudia PIGINI, 2015. "A Misspecification Test for Finite-Mixture Logistic Models for Clustered Binary and Ordered Responses," Working Papers 410, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    17. Greg DiRienzo, 2004. "Nonparametric Comparison of Two Survival-Time Distributions in the Presence of Dependent Censoring," Harvard University Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1000, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    18. J. E. Mills & C. A. Field & D. J. Dupuis, 2002. "Marginally Specified Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Robust Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 727-734, December.
    19. Maria Josefsson & Michael J. Daniels, 2021. "Bayesian semi‐parametric G‐computation for causal inference in a cohort study with MNAR dropout and death," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 398-414, March.
    20. Jason Roy & Michael J. Daniels, 2008. "A General Class of Pattern Mixture Models for Nonignorable Dropout with Many Possible Dropout Times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 538-545, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:11:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12561-019-09254-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.