IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v31y2007i4p836-852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Social Capital in Breaking Socio‐Institutional Inertia in Regional Development

Author

Listed:
  • TIMO PIHKALA
  • VESA HARMAAKORPI
  • SATU PEKKARINEN

Abstract

A shift in the techno‐economic paradigm will affect regions; regions, however, are path‐dependent units. This path‐dependency often leads to considerable socio‐institutional inertia in the process of transformation whereby regions aim to remain competitive in the face of worldwide competition. The present article assesses the role of the dynamic capabilities of social capital in the process of regional adaptation. A survey conducted in the Lahti urban region in Finland is used as empirical data. The results of the survey reveal the respondents' fairly good awareness of the prevailing techno‐economic paradigm and of the strong socio‐institutional inertia confronting change in practice. The results suggest, however, that there are systematic differences in responsiveness between local politicians and other decision‐makers. The study concludes with a discussion of the relevance of shared common views on the development needed within the region. Résumé Un changement dans le schéma conceptuel techno‐économique va affecter les régions, lesquelles présentent toutefois une ‘dépendance de chemin’. Cette situation conduit souvent à une très forte inertie socio‐institutionnelle dans le processus de transformation par lequel des régions s'efforcent de garder leur place face à la concurrence mondiale. L'article évalue le rôle des capacités dynamiques du capital social au sein du processus d'adaptation régionale. Une enquête menée dans la zone urbaine de Lahti, en Finlande, fournit les données empiriques. D'après ses résultats, les personnes interrogées ont une perception assez bonne du paradigme techno‐économique dominant et de la puissante inertie socio‐institutionnelle qui s'oppose concrètement au changement. Il en ressort cependant des différences systématiques dans la réactivité entre les hommes politiques et les autres décideurs. En conclusion, l'étude analyse la pertinence des opinions communes partagées concernant le développement nécessaire dans la région.

Suggested Citation

  • Timo Pihkala & Vesa Harmaakorpi & Satu Pekkarinen, 2007. "The Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Social Capital in Breaking Socio‐Institutional Inertia in Regional Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 836-852, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:31:y:2007:i:4:p:836-852
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00757.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00757.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00757.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomi Tura & Vesa Harmaakorpi, 2005. "Social capital in building regional innovative capability," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 1111-1125.
    2. Maskell, Peter & Malmberg, Anders, 1999. "Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(2), pages 167-185, March.
    3. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    4. Richard R. Nelson, 1991. "Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S2), pages 61-74, December.
    5. Archibugi, Daniele & Michie, Jonathan, 1995. "Technology and Innovation: An Introduction," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(1), pages 1-4, February.
    6. Kathleen R. Conner & C. K. Prahalad, 1996. "A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(5), pages 477-501, October.
    7. Ron Boschma, 2004. "Competitiveness of Regions from an Evolutionary Perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1001-1014.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jurgita Bruneckiene & Irena Pekarskiene & Oksana Palekiene & Zaneta Simanaviciene, 2019. "An Assessment of Socio-Economic Systems’ Resilience to Economic Shocks: The Case of Lithuanian Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Ioannidis, Panos, 2015. "Από Τον Καποδίστρια Στον Καλλικράτη: Θεσμικές Μεταρρυθμίσεις Της Τοπικής Αυτοδιοίκησης Και Συνεργατικές Στρατηγικές Στην Ανατολική Μακεδονία Και Θράκη [From Kapodistrias to Kallikrates: Local Gover," MPRA Paper 66614, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Charles Conteh, 2013. "Changing Trends in Regional Economic Development Policy Governance: The Case of Northern Ontario, Canada," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1419-1437, July.
    4. Brita Hermelin & Grete Rusten, 2018. "A place-based approach to social entrepreneurship for social integration – Cases from Norway and Sweden," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(4), pages 367-383, June.
    5. Jurgita Bruneckiene & Robertas Jucevicius & Ineta Zykiene & Jonas Rapsikevicius & Mantas Lukauskas, 2019. "Assessment of Investment Attractiveness in European Countries by Artificial Neural Networks: What Competences are Needed to Make a Decision on Collective Well-Being?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Gölgeci, Ismail & Larimo, Jorma & Arslan, Ahmad, 2017. "Institutions and dynamic capabilities: Theoretical insights and research agenda for strategic entrepreneurship," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 243-252.
    7. Brita Hermelin & Hans Rämö, 2017. "Intermediary activities and agendas of regional cleantech networks in Sweden," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 130-146, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Alejandra Molina, 2011. "A Sectoral System of Innovation Analysis of Technological Upgrading in the Food Processing Sector in Argentina, Brazil and Chile," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 3(2), pages 287-325, July.
    2. Frank Neffke & Matté Hartog & Ron Boschma & Martin Henning, 2018. "Agents of Structural Change: The Role of Firms and Entrepreneurs in Regional Diversification," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(1), pages 23-48, January.
    3. Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen & Spender, JC & Groen, Aard, 2009. "The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques," MPRA Paper 21442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Villalonga, Belen, 2004. "Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 205-230, June.
    5. Rui Baptista & Murat Karaöz & João Correia Leitão, 2020. "Diversification by young, small firms: the role of pre-entry resources and entry mistakes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 103-122, June.
    6. Frank T. Rothaermel & Maria Tereza Alexandre, 2009. "Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 759-780, August.
    7. Roberta CAPELLO, 2012. "Regional economics: theoretical achievements and challenges," Timisoara Journal of Economics, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 5(18), pages 313-335.
    8. Ana Villar & César Camisón & Montserrat Boronat, 2007. "Technical Strategic Alliances And Performance: The Mediating Effect Of Knowledge ¿Based Competencies," Working Papers. Serie EC 2007-11, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    9. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 111-132, December.
    10. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    11. Camisón, César & Forés, Beatriz, 2011. "Knowledge creation and absorptive capacity: The effect of intra-district shared competences," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 66-86, March.
    12. Anne Margarian & Cécile Détang-Dessendre & Aleksandra Barczak & Corinne Tanguy, 2022. "Endogenous rural dynamics: an analysis of labour markets, human resource practices and firm performance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-33, August.
    13. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kogler, Dieter F., 2010. "Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 381-410, Elsevier.
    14. Nguyen, Thi Phuong Thao & Huang, Fang & Tian, Xiaowen, 2023. "Intellectual property protection need as a driver for open innovation: Empirical evidence from Vietnam," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. Vachara Peansupap & Derek Walker, 2006. "Innovation diffusion at the implementation stage of a construction project: a case study of information communication technology," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 321-332.
    16. Carayannopoulos, Sofy & Auster, Ellen R., 2010. "External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 254-267, March.
    17. Grillitsch, Markus & Nilsson, Magnus, 2019. "The Role of Trust in Regional Development," Papers in Innovation Studies 2019/8, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    18. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2015. "Being ‘Green and Competitive’: The Impact of Environmental Actions and Collaborations on Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 413-430, September.
    19. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2007. "Institutional reflexivity," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 2/2007, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    20. Filipe M. Santos & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2005. "Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 491-508, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:31:y:2007:i:4:p:836-852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.