IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v48y1972i3p387-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized Production Function and Factor‐Intensity Crossovers: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Yeung
  • Herbert Tsang

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Yeung & Herbert Tsang, 1972. "Generalized Production Function and Factor‐Intensity Crossovers: An Empirical Analysis," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 48(3), pages 387-399, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:48:y:1972:i:3:p:387-399
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb00786.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb00786.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb00786.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philpot, Gordon, 1970. "Labor Quality, Returns to Scale and the Elasticity of Factor Substitution," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 52(2), pages 194-199, May.
    2. Bagicha S. Minhas, 1962. "The Homohypallagic Production Function, Factor-Intensity Reversals, and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70(2), pages 138-138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sampson, Thomas, 2016. "Assignment reversals: Trade, skill allocation and wage inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 365-409.
    2. Richard A. Brecher & Till Gross, 2019. "A minimum‐wage model of unemployment and growth: The case of a backward‐bending demand curve for labor," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 15(3), pages 297-309, September.
    3. Davis, Donald R., 1995. "Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 201-226, November.
    4. Bjarne S. Jensen & Martin Richter, 2008. "Stochastic One-Sector and Two-Sector Growth Models in Continuous Time," DEGIT Conference Papers c013_035, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    5. Kurokawa, Yoshinori, 2011. "Is a skill intensity reversal a mere theoretical curiosum? Evidence from the US and Mexico," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 151-154, August.
    6. Kozo Kiyota & Yoshinori Kurokawa, 2022. "Factor intensity reversals redux: Feenstra is right!," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 885-914, September.
    7. Gerassimos Bertsatos & Nicholas Tsounis, 2024. "Differences in Total Factor Productivity and the Pattern of International Trade," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Siddiqui, Muhammad Shahid, 2015. "Environmental taxes and international spillovers: The case of a small open economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 70-80.
    9. Marc Nerlove, 1967. "Recent Empirical Studies of the CES and Related Production Functions," NBER Chapters, in: The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production, pages 55-136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Dvoskin, Ariel & Ianni, Guido, 2021. "Produced means of production and the chain of comparative advantages," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 635-647.
    11. Feenstra, Robert C., 1996. "Trade and uneven growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 229-256, April.
    12. Guo, Baoping, 2015. "Leontief Paradox Explored A New Trade Pattern When Countries Have Different Technologies," MPRA Paper 96929, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2019.
    13. Haiwen Zhou, 2007. "Factor Endowment, the Choice of Technology, and the Volume of Trade," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 593-611.
    14. Arye Hillman & Seev Hirsch, 1979. "Factor intensity reversals: Conceptual experiments with traded goods aggregates," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 115(2), pages 272-283, June.
    15. Gilroy, Bernard Michael, 1991. "Faktorgehalt und internationaler Handel [Factor content and international trade]," MPRA Paper 21037, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Leamer, Edward E. & Levinsohn, James, 1995. "International trade theory: The evidence," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 26, pages 1339-1394, Elsevier.
    17. Guo, Baoping, 2015. "Heckscher-Ohlin Trade, Leontief Trade, and Factor Conversion Trade When Countries Have Different Technologies," MPRA Paper 95161, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jul 2019.
    18. Bjarne S. Jensen, 2011. "Comparative Costs, the Invisible Hand, and Factor Endowments: Ricardo, Ohlin, and Samuelson," DEGIT Conference Papers c016_042, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    19. John Cawley & David C. Grabowski & Richard A. Hirth, 2004. "Factor Substitution and Unobserved Factor Quality in Nursing Homes," NBER Working Papers 10465, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Bruce Elmslie & William Milberg, 1992. "International trade and factor intensity uniformity: An empirical assessment," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 128(3), pages 464-486, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:48:y:1972:i:3:p:387-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.