IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecinqu/v57y2019i4p2125-2146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

After The Tournament: Outcomes And Effort Provision

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew McGee
  • Peter McGee

Abstract

Outcomes of workplace competitions may themselves influence subsequent behavior—particularly if employees feel wronged. In a laboratory experiment, we find that—consistent with inequity aversion—tournament losers supply less postcompetition effort than winners when doing so reduces their tournament opponent's earnings. Consistent with procedural fairness concerns, subjects who lose arbitrarily decided tournaments that disregard tournament effort choices supply even less post‐tournament effort than other losers. While losers' effort reductions consistent with inequity aversion persist, effort reductions following arbitrarily decided tournaments fade over time. Finally, we show that effort reductions related to inequity aversion could potentially be mitigated through workplace rotations. (JEL C90, J30, D03)

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew McGee & Peter McGee, 2019. "After The Tournament: Outcomes And Effort Provision," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(4), pages 2125-2146, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:57:y:2019:i:4:p:2125-2146
    DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12816
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecin.12816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Johnson & Timothy C. Salmon, 2016. "Sabotage versus Discouragement: Which Dominates Post Promotion Tournament Behavior?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 82(3), pages 673-696, January.
    2. Grosch, Kerstin & Ibañez, Marcela & Viceisza, Angelino, 2022. "Competition and prosociality: A lab-in-the-field experiment in Ghana," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Ďuriník, Michal & Morita, Hodaka & Servátka, Maroš & Zhang, Le, 2023. "Promotions and Group Identity," MPRA Paper 119389, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Angelova, Vera & Giebe, Thomas & Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta, 2018. "Does a short-term increase in incentives boost performance?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 31-34.
    5. Kerstin Grosch & Holger A. Rau, 2020. "Procedural Unfair Wage Differentials And Their Effects On Unethical Behavior," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(4), pages 1689-1706, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
    • J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:57:y:2019:i:4:p:2125-2146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.