IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v28y1990i2p249-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Union Presence and Labour Productivity in British Manufacturing Industry. A Reply to Nolan and Marginson

Author

Listed:
  • David Metcalf

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David Metcalf, 1990. "Union Presence and Labour Productivity in British Manufacturing Industry. A Reply to Nolan and Marginson," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 249-266, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:28:y:1990:i:2:p:249-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1990.tb00366.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michail Veliziotis & Guy Vernon, 2023. "From monopoly to voice effects? British workplace unionism and productivity performance into the new millennium," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 574-594, September.
    2. Paul Miller & Charles Mulvey, 1993. "What Do Australian Unions Do?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 69(3), pages 315-342, September.
    3. David E. Guest, 1990. "Have British Workers Been Working Harder in Thatcher's Britain? A Re-Consideration of the Concept of Effort," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 293-312, November.
    4. Richard B. Freeman, 1995. "The Future for Unions in Decentralized Collective Bargaining Systems: US and UK Unionism in an Era of Crisis," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 519-536, December.
    5. Erol Taymaz, 1991. "The Impact of Trade Unions on the Diffusion of Technology: The Case of NC Machine Tools," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 305-311, June.
    6. Bryson, Alex & Dale-Olsen, Harald, 2020. "Unions, Tripartite Competition and Innovation," IZA Discussion Papers 13015, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Moreton, David R., 1998. "An open shop trade union model of wages, effort and membership," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 511-527, August.
    8. John H. Pencavel, 2004. "The Surprising Retreat of Union Britain," NBER Chapters, in: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980–2000, pages 181-232, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. John T. Addison & Joachim Wagner, 1994. "UK Unionism and Innovative Activity: Some Cautionary Remarks on the Basis of a Simple Cross-country Test," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 85-98, March.
    10. John Benson, 1994. "The Economic Effects of Unionism on Japanese Manufacturing Enterprises," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Bruno Chiarini & Massimo Giannini, 2000. "A Model Of Union Behaviour And Benefits Under Uncertainty - Did Thatcher'S Benefits Policy Increase Employment And Reduce Union Power?," Working Papers 5_2000, D.E.S. (Department of Economic Studies), University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    12. Abbas Valadkhani, 2003. "An Empirical Analysis of Australian Labour Productivity," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 273-291, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:28:y:1990:i:2:p:249-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.