The two standard monthly measures of employment growth, one from a survey of payrolls and the other from a survey of households, often differ substantially, and the payroll measure is widely regarded as the more reliable. This paper questions that preference and concludes it is not supported by the data. Reviewing a number of nonsampling problems inherent in the two series, the paper argues that the biggest problem may be the payroll series’ need to account for the birth and death of business establishments. The paper then examines how well each employment measure tracks contemporaneous changes in output and unemployment. As a further test, it also compares simple aggregate employment functions using the two series. On balance, all these tests suggest that averaging the employment change from the two series provides the best estimate; further tests show that this average outperforms either series alone.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Volume (Year): 36 (2005) Issue (Month): 2005-2 () Pages: 285-321 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Find related papers by JEL classification: C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Other Model Applications E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomics: Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure