IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/jetart/v1y2024i13p69-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Devising approaches to modeling enterprise business processes under conditions of modern digital technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Olena Arefieva

    (National Aviation University)

  • Zarina Poberezhna

    (National Aviation University)

  • Svitlana Petrovska

    (National Aviation University)

  • Serhii Arefiev

    (National Aviation University)

  • Yuriy Kopcha

    (National Aviation University)

Abstract

A study was conducted on modeling business processes at an enterprise under the conditions of modern digital technologies, which could make it possible to determine the level of digitization at the enterprise in general, minimize costs, optimize work, and enable business processes automation. The main and most important business processes at an enterprise require simulation on basic digital technologies. As part of the research, the main business processes at an enterprise under the conditions of digital technologies were formed, which make it possible to determine the level of efficiency of the enterprise from the implemented digital technologies and the ways that the enterprise should implement to improve it. It has been established that digitalization has a positive effect on a country's GDP level, the level of employment, and the growth of the population's well-being. A methodical approach to the formation of the company's strategy based on the modeling of business processes, taking into account digital technologies, has been devised. This approach, unlike existing ones, makes it possible to determine the necessary level of digitization and identify the scope of implementation of the implementation of digital technologies at the enterprise. This makes it possible to assess digitization at an enterprise and determine the most important business processes for its operation. Practical implementation of the proposed methodology was carried out for four transport industry enterprises. The most important business processes for enterprises have been determined. According to the results of the study, it was found that digital modeling and optimization of business processes has the greatest impact, which is (3.00) and shows the level of effectiveness of the implementation of digital technologies, as well as their orientation to the search for appropriate sources of financial resources

Suggested Citation

  • Olena Arefieva & Zarina Poberezhna & Svitlana Petrovska & Serhii Arefiev & Yuriy Kopcha, 2024. "Devising approaches to modeling enterprise business processes under conditions of modern digital technologies," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 1(13 (127)), pages 69-79, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:1:y:2024:i:13:p:69-79
    DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2024.298143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/download/298143/291753
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.298143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vinit Parida & David Sjödin & Wiebke Reim, 2019. "Reviewing Literature on Digitalization, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Industry: Past Achievements and Future Promises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Moinak Maiti & Parthajit Kayal, 2017. "Digitization: Its Impact on Economic Development & Trade," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(6), pages 541-549.
    3. Hanna Zhosan & Natalia Kyrychenko, 2022. "Management of digitalization of business processes of enterprise activities," Economic Synergy, Higher Educational Institution Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific & Technical University, issue 4, pages 82-91.
    4. Olha Kibik & Olena Taran-Lala & Volodymyr Saienko & Tetiana Metil & Tetiana Umanets & Iryna Maksymchuk, 2022. "Strategic Vectors for Enterprise Development in the Context of the Digitalization of the Economy," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 384-395, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurelija Burinskienė & Milena Seržantė, 2022. "Digitalisation as the Indicator of the Evidence of Sustainability in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Hornyák, Miklós & Kruzslicz, Ferenc & Lányi, Beatrix, 2023. "A kis- és középvállalatok digitális transzformációja - az online jelenlét és a versenyképesség összefüggései [The relationships between the online presence of SMEs and competitiveness]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 517-543.
    3. Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles & Janaina Mascarenhas & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Adriana Hoffman Trevisan, 2022. "Smoothing the circular economy transition: The role of resources and capabilities enablers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1814-1837, May.
    4. Hung, Ngo Thai, 2023. "Green investment, financial development, digitalization and economic sustainability in Vietnam: Evidence from a quantile-on-quantile regression and wavelet coherence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    5. Khanra, Sayantan & Dhir, Amandeep & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2021. "Servitization research: A review and bibliometric analysis of past achievements and future promises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 151-166.
    6. Secinaro, Silvana & Brescia, Valerio & Lanzalonga, Federico & Santoro, Gabriele, 2022. "Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    7. Jingsi Zhang & Liangqun Qi, 2021. "Crisis Preparedness of Healthcare Manufacturing Firms during the COVID-19 Outbreak: Digitalization and Servitization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Wiebke Reim & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2021. "Circular business model implementation: A capability development case study from the manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2745-2757, September.
    10. Ewa Stawiarska & Danuta Szwajca & Mirosław Matusek & Radosław Wolniak, 2021. "Diagnosis of the Maturity Level of Implementing Industry 4.0 Solutions in Selected Functional Areas of Management of Automotive Companies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-38, April.
    11. Sergey V. Khmura & Vilena A. Yakimova, 2023. "Crowdfunding platforms in Russia: Methodological tools for agents’ investment decision-making," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 24(3), pages 46-73, October.
    12. Mara Bergamaschi & Cristina Bettinelli & Elena Lissana & Pasquale Massimo Picone, 2021. "Past, ongoing, and future debate on the interplay between internationalization and digitalization," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 983-1032, December.
    13. Grijalvo, Mercedes & García-Wang, Carmen, 2023. "Sustainable business model for climate finance. Key drivers for the commercial banking sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    14. Gianmarco Bressanelli & Federico Adrodegari & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Vinit Parida, 2022. "Towards the Smart Circular Economy Paradigm: A Definition, Conceptualization, and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Fernando E. García-Muiña & María Sonia Medina-Salgado & Anna Maria Ferrari & Marco Cucchi, 2020. "Sustainability Transition in Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Clauss & Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, 2020. "Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3006-3024, December.
    17. Tlou Maggie Masenya, 2023. "Big Data Analytics as a Game Changer for Business Model Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in South Africa," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. David Israel Contreras-Medina & Sergio Ernesto Medina-Cuéllar & Julia Sánchez-Gómez & Carlos Mario Rodríguez-Peralta, 2021. "Innovation of Women Farmers: A Technological Proposal for Mezcalilleras’ Sustainability in Mexico, Based on Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Haibo Hu & Tao Huang & Yang Cheng & Haitao Lu, 2019. "The Evolution of Sustainable Business Model Innovation: Evidence from a Sharing Economy Platform in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Vatankhah, Sanaz & Bamshad, Vahideh & Altinay, Levent & De Vita, Glauco, 2023. "Understanding business model development through the lens of complexity theory: Enablers and barriers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:1:y:2024:i:13:p:69-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.