IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ann/inecon/y2016i14p158-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metody pomiaru e-administracji w kontekście konkurencyjności międzynarodowej / Methods of measurement e-government in the context of international competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Mańkowska

    (Gdynia Maritime University)

Abstract

The subject under discussion is the problem of publications on the relationship between the e-government implementation process and the ability to compete. Today, it is estimated that the key objective of the informatisation of public administration at both central and local levels, is the preparation and implementation of electronic public services for citizens and businesses productively and efficiently. The e-government vision presented by the European Commission, and gradually implemented through EU Member States shows, that the process of developing e-government should serve as a tool to support the processes of governance. Projects related to the informatisation may influence the improvement of the education system and health services, create jobs, change how resources are managed, reduce transaction costs and the overall transformation of institutional nature. The currently used measuring tools of benefits from the implementation of public e-services and general development of e-government do not always show directly whether they are generated. The purpose of the publication is to identify and evaluate currently used indicators of electronic administration development in the context of measuring the benefits of this process, which are significant for improving the country’s competitiveness in the international arena.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Mańkowska, 2016. "Metody pomiaru e-administracji w kontekście konkurencyjności międzynarodowej / Methods of measurement e-government in the context of international competitiveness," International Economics, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, issue 14, pages 158-168, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ann:inecon:y:2016:i:14:p:158-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repozytorium.uni.lodz.pl:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11089/18792/Ma%C5%84kowska%202016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shirish C. Srivastava & Thompson S.H. Teo, 2008. "The Relationship between E-Government and National Competitiveness: The Moderating Influence of Environmental Factors," Post-Print hal-00465277, HAL.
    2. Önsel, Sule & Ülengin, Füsun & Ulusoy, Gündüz & Aktas, Emel & Kabak, Özgür & Topcu, Y. Ilker, 2008. "A new perspective on the competitiveness of nations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 221-246, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María-Dolores Benítez-Márquez & Eva M Sánchez-Teba & Isabel Coronado-Maldonado, 2022. "An alternative index to the global competitiveness index," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Mashabela, Juliet & Raputsoane, Leroi, 2018. "Important factors in a nations international competitiveness ranking," MPRA Paper 86477, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ülengin, Füsun & Kabak, Özgür & Önsel, Sule & Aktas, Emel & Parker, Barnett R., 2011. "The competitiveness of nations and implications for human development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 16-27, March.
    4. Irina-Elena Gentimir, 2013. "The Role Of The Private Sector In Developing And Supporting International Competitiveness," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 5(2), pages 205-215.
    5. Baiba Å AVRI?A & Santa SPRO?E-RIMÅ A, 2014. "Role Of Science In Enhancing National Competitiveness: Case Of Latvia," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 564-576, November.
    6. Alathur, Sreejith & Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. & Gupta, M.P., 2016. "Determinants of e-participation in the citizens and the government initiatives: Insights from India," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 25-35.
    7. Idris, Zera Zuryana & Ismail, Normaz Wana & Ibrahim, Saifuzzaman & Hamzah, Hanny Zurina, 2021. "High-Technology Trade: Does it Enhance National Competitiveness?," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 55(3), pages 35-48.
    8. Salas-Velasco, Manuel, 2018. "Production efficiency measurement and its determinants across OECD countries: The role of business sophistication and innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 60-73.
    9. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    10. Bazilian, Morgan & Onyeji, Ijeoma, 2012. "Fossil fuel subsidy removal and inadequate public power supply: Implications for businesses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-5.
    11. Lihua Wang & Xin Luo, 2021. "Understanding the Interplay Between Government Microblogs and Citizen Engagement: Evidence from China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 487-520, June.
    12. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Marta Komuda & Katarzyna Kuźmicz & Elżbieta Szubzda & Joanna Urban, 2008. "The DEA method in public sector institutions efficiency analysis on the basis of higher education institutions," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 18(4), pages 89-105.
    13. Pal, Debdatta & Mitra, Subrata K. & Chatterjee, Somdeep, 2022. "Does “investment climate” affect GDP? Panel data evidence using reduced-form and stochastic frontier analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 301-310.
    14. Young Bum Lee, 2017. "Exploring the Relationship between E-Government Development and Environmental Sustainability: A Study of Small Island Developing States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Agbozo, E. & Asamoah, B. K., 2019. "The Role of E-Government Systems in Ensuring Government Effectiveness and Control of Corruption," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 5(2), pages 53-60.
    16. Olivera Kostoska & Ilija Hristoski, 2017. "ICTs and innovation for competitiveness: Evidence for Western Balkans vis-?-vis the European Union," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 35(2), pages 487-518.
    17. Vincent Charles & Guillermo Díaz, 2017. "A Non-radial DEA Index for Peruvian Regional Competitiveness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 747-770, November.
    18. Krishnan, Satish & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Lymm, John, 2017. "Determinants of electronic participation and electronic government maturity: Insights from cross-country data," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 297-312.
    19. Konara, Palitha, 2020. "The role of language connectedness in reducing home bias in trade, investment, information, and people flows," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    e-government; national competitiveness; public value of e-government;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ann:inecon:y:2016:i:14:p:158-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: International Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/welodpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.