IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/revebs/y2012i9qefaliaa.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Improvement Methods And Their Usage In Albanian Public Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Arjan QEFALIA

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economy, Tirana University; ALBANIA)

  • Arbina TOTONI

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economy, Tirana University; ALBANIA)

Abstract

Education and higher education in particular is one of strategic priorities for development, which guarantees progress. Its role is related to all characteristics of a society, and it undoubtedly constitutes one of the most important areas of life of a nation. It has stable and long-term impact on all aspects of activities related to people and their welfare. The challenge to be faced in the transition period requires that higher education in Albania to be developed, consolidated and follow the trend of higher education in developed countries. Quality itself and by using the continuous quality improvement methods by universities, it constitutes the basis for ensuring the success of the Albanian higher education institutions in the future. In this paper, through the use of literature, the questionnaires and interviews directed mainly to the professors / pedagogues working in Albanian public higher education institutions, the focus is to show the continuous quality improvement methods used by universities / faculties / departments, and to test the hypothesis: The use or not of the continuous improvement methods is dependent on the studies type (those higher education institutions that offer first cycle studies, first and second cycle studies, or first, second and third cycle studies) that the higher education institution offers.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjan QEFALIA & Arbina TOTONI, 2012. "Quality Improvement Methods And Their Usage In Albanian Public Universities," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 9, pages 159-171, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:aic:revebs:y:2012:i:9:qefaliaa
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rebs.feaa.uaic.ro/articles/pdfs/134.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arjan Qefalia & Andri Koxhaj, 2011. "The Use of Continuous Improvement in Albanian Public Higher Education," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 14(41), pages 61-80, September.
    2. Robert Birnbaum, 2000. "The Life Cycle of Academic Management Fads," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arjan Qefalia & Arbina Totoni, 2012. "The Correlation Accreditation - Bologna Process - Continuous Quality Improvement Based In Professors' Perceptions In Albanian Public Universities," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(14), pages 1-23.
    2. de la Torre, R. & Lusa, A. & Mateo, M., 2016. "A MILP model for the long term academic staff size and composition planning in public universities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Noah Isserman & Ann Markusen, 2013. "Shaping the Future through Narrative," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 36(1), pages 115-136, January.
    4. Rich, Eliot, 2008. "Management fads and information delays: An exploratory simulation study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(11), pages 1143-1151, November.
    5. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk, 2019. "Advancing lean management: The missing quantitative approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    6. Beerkens, Maarja, 2013. "Facts and fads in academic research management: The effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1679-1693.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    HIGHER EDUCATION; Continuous Quality Improvement; TQM;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:revebs:y:2012:i:9:qefaliaa. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.