IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/earnsa/28748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La certificacion como estrategia para la recuperacion de la confianza del consumidor en la adquisicion de la carne de ternera

Author

Listed:
  • Barrena Figueroa, Ramo
  • Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes
  • Gil, Jose Maria
  • Gracia, Azucena
  • Rivera, Luis M.

Abstract

Resumen El objetivo del trabajo se centra en analizar el efecto de la presencia de etiqueta en un producto con el fin de minimizar el riesgo percibido o la incertidumbre asociada al producto. El análisis ha sido realizado tomando como ejemplo la carne fresca de ternera, producto que ha presentado en Europa, en general, y en España, en particular, importantes problemas de salubridad o seguridad alimentaria que han generado una importante pérdida de confianza por parte de los consumidores e, indirectamente, una disminución de su consumo, lo que ha supuesto, a su vez, serias implicaciones sobre la oferta. Teniendo en cuenta el objetivo planteado, se especifica un modelo para analizar la disposición del consumidor a aumentar el consumo de carne de ternera si se le garantiza su salubridad. Se considera que el consumidor realiza una doble decisión: 1) consumir más o no; y 2) una vez que ha decidido incrementar su consumo, determina en qué cantidad, considerándose, adicionalmente, que ambas decisiones se adoptan de forma simultánea. Los resultados obtenidos en tres Comunidades Autónomas españolas (Comunidad de Aragón, Comunidad Foral de Navarra y Comunidad Valenciana) muestran la idoneidad de las etiquetas para mitigar los efectos que sobre la demanda tienen estos problemas surgidos en la oferta, siendo los resultados especialmente relevantes en el mercado que ha presentado mayores problemas de salubridad. Palabras Clave: comportamiento del consumidor, modelos de decisión, etiqueta, carne de ternera, seguridad alimentaria. Summary The objective of the paper is to analyse the effect of the label product presence in the reduction of the health hazard perceived or in the uncertainty associated to a product. The market selected like an example was the fresh beef, because in Europe, in general, and in Spain in particular, has been serious problems related with the food safety. These problems had influenced in the lost confidence of the consumers with important consequences in the supply. We propose a consumer decision model with two steps: 1) to consume more or no, 2) if the consumer decided to increase the consume analyse the factors which affect the quantity to increment; these decisions are considered simultaneous. The results obtained in the three Spanish regions (Comunidad de Aragón, Comunidad Foral de Navarra and Comunidad Valenciana) showed the suitability of the utilisation of the labels in the product to reduce or mitigate the demand effects of these supply complications, specially in the market which major food safety problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrena Figueroa, Ramo & Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes & Gil, Jose Maria & Gracia, Azucena & Rivera, Luis M., 2003. "La certificacion como estrategia para la recuperacion de la confianza del consumidor en la adquisicion de la carne de ternera," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 3(01), pages 1-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:earnsa:28748
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.28748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28748/files/03010007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.28748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Scott Shonkwiler & Steven T. Yen, 1999. "Two-Step Estimation of a Censored System of Equations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(4), pages 972-982.
    2. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M., 1990. "Conceptual model of the quality perception process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 309-333, December.
    3. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & van Trijp, Hans C M, 1996. "Quality Guidance: A Consumer-Based Approach to Food Quality Improvement Using Partial Least Squares," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 23(2), pages 195-215.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Babatunde Oluwasegun Alao & Andrew Bamidele Falowo & Amanda Chulayo & Voster Muchenje, 2018. "Consumers’ Preference and Factors Influencing Offal Consumption in Amathole District Eastern Cape, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezińska & Dominika Kuberska & Magdalena Ankiel & Agnieszka Brelik, 2020. "Consumer’s Behavior in a Multi-Attribute Concept of a Food Product," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 526-551.
    3. Juan Jose Blazquez-Resino & Santiago Gutierrez-Broncano & Pedro Jimenez-Estevez & Israel Roberto Perez-Jimenez, 2021. "The Effect of Ethnocentrism on Product Evaluation and Purchase Intention: The Case of Extra Virgin Olive Oil (EVOO)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Barrena Figueroa, Ramo & Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes & Gracia, Azucena & Gil, Jose Maria, 2002. "Confidence in the Beef Production System as a Key Factor to Mitigate the Impact of BSE on Beef Consumption," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24873, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Brunsø, Karen & Fjord, Thomas Ahle & Grunert, Klaus G., 2002. "Consumers' food choice and quality perception," MAPP Working Papers 77, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    6. Biancamaria Torquati & Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato & Sonia Venanzi, 2018. "Tasty or Sustainable? The Effect of Product Sensory Experience on a Sustainable New Food Product: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments on Chianina Tinned Beef," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Frank M. Fossen & Ray Rees & Davud Rostam-Afschar & Viktor Steiner, 2020. "The effects of income taxation on entrepreneurial investment: A puzzle?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(6), pages 1321-1363, December.
    8. Meyerhoefer, Chad D. & Ranney, Christine K. & Sahn, David E., 2004. "Consistent Estimation Of Longitudinal Censored Demand Systems," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19992, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Femenia, Fabienne, 2019. "A Meta-Analysis of the Price and Income Elasticities of Food Demand," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(2), June.
    10. Bryce, Cormac & Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2020. "The journal quality perception gap," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    11. Boonsaeng, Tullaya & Carpio, Carlos E. & Zhen, Chen & Okrent, Abigail M., 2012. "The Effect of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program on Food Spending Among Low-Income Households," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124839, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Mutuc, Maria Erlinda M. & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Pan, Suwen & Yorobe, Jose M., 2012. "Impact Assessment of Bt Corn Adoption in the Philippines," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 117-135, February.
    13. Yajuan Dong & Yi Jin & Khan Anwar Kamal, 2023. "The Impact of Perceived Quality of Government Subsidies on Residents’ Travel Intention Post-COVID-19 in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Vassilopoulos, Achilleas & Klonaris, Stathis & Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Lazaridis, Panagiotis, 2012. "Modeling quality demand with data from Household Budget Surveys: An application to meat and fish products in Greece," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 2744-2750.
    15. Dmitry V. Zhukov & Miraj Ahmed Bhuiyan & Asad Ullah, 2015. "Utilization of the country of origin effect in product-harm crisis management: an overview of literature and a conceptual model proposition," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(2), pages 54-70, January.
    16. Heiman, Amir & McWilliams, Bruce & Zilberman, David, 2001. "Demonstrations and money-back guarantees: market mechanisms to reduce uncertainty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 71-84, October.
    17. Abdoul G. Sam & Babatunde O. Abidoye & Sihle Mashaba, 2021. "Climate change and household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa: empirical evidence from Swaziland," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(2), pages 439-455, April.
    18. West, Sarah E. & Williams, R.C.Roberton III, 2004. "Estimates from a consumer demand system: implications for the incidence of environmental taxes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 535-558, May.
    19. Huang, Kuo S. & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 2000. "Estimation of Food Demand Nutrient Elasticities from household Survey Data," Technical Bulletins 184370, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Juan Antonio Campos Soria & Ricardo Pagan Rodríguez, 2003. "Internal and external effects of quality on competitiveness: Applications for the hotel sector in Spain," ERSA conference papers ersa03p131, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:earnsa:28748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.