IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afjecr/315826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential Trade effects of Democratic Republic of Congo Joining the East African Community bloc

Author

Listed:
  • Mugume, Regean
  • Nattabi, Kibirige Aida

Abstract

DRC has expressed interest in joining the EAC regional bloc to tap into the benefits of the regional trade and expanded markets. Using trend analysis of trade flows and SMART-WITS Partial Equilibrium model, this study examines the likely impact of DRC’s membership in the EAC, to establish trade effects of liberalising trade between EAC and DRC. The emerging results reveal that trade effects are positive among the EAC partner states, more so for Rwanda and Uganda given that there are the leading EAC exporters to DRC. The analysis also identifies the EAC main economic sectors poised to benefit a result of this trade liberalisation. At a sectoral level, the largest trade effects will be experienced in agro-processing, metal products and mineral ores industries. These findings point to the need for EAC members to pursue develop these sectors while pursuing industrialization agenda to replace DRC’s imports from the rest of the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Mugume, Regean & Nattabi, Kibirige Aida, 2021. "The potential Trade effects of Democratic Republic of Congo Joining the East African Community bloc," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 9(4), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:315826
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.315826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/315826/files/Mugume.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.315826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milton A. Iyoba, 2005. "Working Paper 77 - Enhancing Africa’s Trade: From Marginalization to an Export - Led Approach to Development," Working Paper Series 212, African Development Bank.
    2. Agnieszka Poczta-Wajda, & Agnieszka Sapa, 2017. "Potential Trade Effects Of Tariff Liberalization Under The Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership (Ttip) For The Eu Agri-Food Sector," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 44(2), June.
    3. Krugman, Paul R., 1979. "Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 469-479, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beverly Lapham & Hiroyuki Kasahara, 2005. "Import Protection as Export Destruction," 2005 Meeting Papers 528, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    2. Elhanan Helpman, 2014. "Foreign Trade and Investment: Firm-level Perspectives," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(321), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Paolo Epifani & Gino Gancia, 2008. "The Skill Bias of World Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(530), pages 927-960, July.
    4. Marijke J.D. Bos & Gonzague Vannoorenberghe, 2019. "Imported input varieties and product innovation: Evidence from five developing countries," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 520-548, May.
    5. Geoffrey Barrows & Hélène Ollivier & Ariell Reshef, 2023. "Production Function Estimation with Multi-Destination Firms," CESifo Working Paper Series 10716, CESifo.
    6. Charlotte Emlinger & Viola Lamani, 2020. "International trade, quality sorting and trade costs: the case of Cognac," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(3), pages 579-609, August.
    7. Tybout, James R. & Westbrook, M. Daniel, 1995. "Trade liberalization and the dimensions of efficiency change in Mexican manufacturing industries," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 53-78, August.
    8. Mary Amiti & Jozef Konings, 2007. "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1611-1638, December.
    9. Ralph E. Gomory, 1996. "Panel discussion: inherent conflict in international trade," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 40(Jun), pages 279-285.
    10. James R. Tybout, 2000. "Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries: How Well Do They Do, and Why?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(1), pages 11-44, March.
    11. Peter Egger & Douglas Nelson, 2011. "How Bad Is Antidumping? Evidence from Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(4), pages 1374-1390, November.
    12. Anwar, Sajid, 2005. "Variable labour supply, specialisation-based external economies, and capital inflow," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 427-437.
    13. Jani Bekő, 2003. "Causality between exports and economic growth: empirical estimates for slovenia," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(2), pages 169-186.
    14. Stephen Devadoss & Kent Lanclos, 2000. "Trade in imperfectly competitive industries: the role of market size and consumer preferences," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 1189-1200.
    15. Raphael Bergoeing & Timothy J. Kehoe, "undated". "Trade Theory and Trade Facts," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv129, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    16. Andrew B. Bernard & Jonathan Eaton & J. Bradford Jensen & Samuel Kortum, 2003. "Plants and Productivity in International Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1268-1290, September.
    17. Carsten Eckel, 2005. "Market Integration and Market Concentration in Horizontally Differentiated Industries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 6(16), pages 1-6.
    18. Hategan D.B. Anca, 2012. "Litterature Review Of The Evolution Of Competitiveness Concept," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 41-46, July.
    19. Aykut Kibritçioglu, 2002. "On the Smithian origins of "new" trade and growth theories," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15.
    20. Tsechien Hsu, 2010. "An open economy general equilibrium model with heterogeneous producers, a homothetic utility function and endogenous elasticity," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 146(4), pages 799-818, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:315826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.