IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v45y2017i19p397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition Policy in the European Film Industry Focused on Consumers’ Interests – a Romanian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Puiu Nistoreanu
  • Violeta Mihaela Dinca
  • Andreea Fortuna ?chiopu

Abstract

European cinema was and still is often assimilated by film consumers as art cinema which is more difficult to understand and ultimately to reach a big number of consumers. The objectives of this paper were to examine the pathway of European cinema market and the relationship with its consumers along with their interests and attitudes towards European films and to research the most important measures taken by European Union institutions under their competition policy to support European films through state aid schemes. In order to give shape to these objectives, in-depth interviews with five elite specialists from the Romanian film industry were used, specialists who possess international expertise and recognition. The problems of the qualitative research are: the modification of consumer behaviour face to European cinema and support measures. The findings suggest that regarding its relationship with consumers and their interests in the seventh art, European cinema faces many different difficulties ranging from the competition with American films and insufficient funds, to the increased comfortableness or coziness of the movie consumers of our times. The paper concludes with examples of measures suggested by the respondents, to help European cinema become more attractive to consumers, measures which are already being implemented by the industry, making the results of our study useful for policy and decision makers within this cultural area.

Suggested Citation

  • Puiu Nistoreanu & Violeta Mihaela Dinca & Andreea Fortuna ?chiopu, 2017. "Competition Policy in the European Film Industry Focused on Consumers’ Interests – a Romanian Perspective," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 397-397, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:45:y:2017:i:19:p:397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2626.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wallentin, Erik, 2016. "Demand for cinema and diverging tastes of critics and audiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 72-81.
    2. Bitsch, Vera, 2005. "Qualitative Research: A Grounded Theory Example and Evaluation Criteria," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vătămănescu Elena-Mădălina & Andrei Andreia Gabriela & Zaiţ Adriana, 2020. "Placing self-assessed health within the systems framework: a preliminary insight into social synergy and syntony," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 626-635, July.
    2. Elena-Madalina VATAMANESCU & Andreea MITAN & Violeta-Mihaela DINCA & Andreia Gabriela ANDREI & Vlad-Andrei ALEXANDRU, 2021. "Smes Internationalization: Between Strategic Collaborators And Intermediaries," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 457-466, November.
    3. Andrei Andreia Gabriela & Dincă Violeta-Mihaela & Mitan Andreea & Vătămănescu Elena-Mădălina, 2021. "Connecting the Dots: Exploring the Knowledge-based Antecedents of SMEs’ Profitability and Development via International Ventures," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(3), pages 167-186, September.
    4. Blănuţă Bianca Alexandra & Bogdan Anca, 2023. "Knowledge Economy in the Retraining Process," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1158-1166, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rombach, Meike & Bitsch, Vera, 2018. "Sector blending: evidence from the German Food Bank," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(2), March.
    2. Kotapati Srinivasa Reddy, 2015. "Beating the Odds! Build theory from emerging markets phenomenon and the emergence of case study research—A “Test-Tube” typology," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1037225-103, December.
    3. Uzea, F. Nicoleta & Fulton, Murray E., 2014. "Mechanisms for Effective Alliance Management: Insights from a Federated Cooperative Marketing System," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Viet Hoang & Vinh Nguyen, 2023. "Determinants of small farmers' participation in contract farming in developing countries: A study in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 836-853, July.
    5. Dauermann, Angelika & Enneking, Ulrich, 2023. "Views from the country road: A qualitative study on the landscape aesthetic perception of dairy barns in the region of the Osnabrück Region (northwestern Germany)," DARE Discussion Papers 2303, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    6. van Winsen, Frankwin & de Mey, Yann & Lauwers, Ludwig & Van Passel, Steven & Vancauteren, Mark & Wauters, Erwin, 2013. "Cognitive mapping: A method to elucidate and present farmers’ risk perception," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 42-52.
    7. Johnson, Aaron J. & Egelkraut, Thorsten M. & Grout, Cyrus A., 2010. "Market Intelligence Utilization by Small Food Companies: An Application of the Grounded Theory Method in Exploratory Research," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 41(2), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Bitsch, Vera & Kassa, Getachew Abate & Harsh, Stephen B. & Mugera, Amin W., 2006. "Human Resource Management Risks: Sources and Control Strategies Based on Dairy Farmer Focus Groups," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(1), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Naeem, Muhammad & Ozuem, Wilson, 2021. "The role of social media in internet banking transition during COVID-19 pandemic: Using multiple methods and sources in qualitative research," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Thomas Daum & Regina Birner, 2017. "The neglected governance challenges of agricultural mechanisation in Africa – insights from Ghana," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(5), pages 959-979, October.
    11. Mechthild Donner & Lummina Horlings & Fatiha Fort & Sietze Vellema, 2017. "Place branding, embeddedness and endogenous rural development: Four European cases," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(4), pages 273-292, November.
    12. Daum, Thomas & Villalba, Roberto & Anidi, Oluwakayode & Mayienga, Sharon Masakhwe & Gupta, Saurabh & Birner, Regina, 2021. "Uber for tractors? Opportunities and challenges of digital tools for tractor hire in India and Nigeria," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Mair, Stefan & Bitsch, Vera, 2018. "Succession in Horticultural Family Businesses. The Role of Socialization and Communication," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(3), June.
    14. Keith D. Harris & Harvey S. James, 2016. "The Production of Food and Fiber: An Adaptation of CoP Features for Sustainable Water Use in Agribusiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Mainville, Denise Y. & Peterson, H. Christopher, 2006. "Coordination Strategy Decisions in Sao Paulo's Fresh Produce Markets: An Empirical Validation of the Peterson, Wysocki & Harsh Framework," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25.
    16. Veronika Villnow & Meike Rombach & Vera Bitsch, 2019. "Examining German Media Coverage of the Re-Evaluation of Glyphosate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Hortigüela Arroyo, María & Ubillos Landa, Silvia, 2019. "Evaluability assessment of a community development leisure program in Spain," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 219-226.
    18. Patience B. Rwamigisa & Regina Birner & Margaret N. Mangheni & Arseni Semana, 2018. "How to promote institutional reforms in the agricultural sector? A case study of Uganda's National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS)," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(5), pages 607-627, September.
    19. Paul Larkin & Daryl Marchant & Amy Syder & Damian Farrow, 2020. "An eye for talent: The recruiters’ role in the Australian Football talent pathway," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Graf, Sarah Lena & Oya, Carlos, 2021. "Is the system of rice intensification (SRI) pro poor? Labour, class and technological change in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European film industry; competition for European cinema; European Union state aid; European consumer of cinema.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • D18 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Protection
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:45:y:2017:i:19:p:397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.