Rational agents with differing priors tend to be overoptimistic about their chances of success. In particular, an agent who tries to choose the action that is most likely to succeed, is more likely to choose an action of which he overestimated, rather than underestimated, the likelihood of success. After studying the comparative statics of this mechanism, I show that it also causes agents to attribute failure to exogenous factors but success to their own choice of action, to disproportionately believe that they will outperform others, to overestimate the precision of their estimates, and to overestimate their control over the outcome.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Volume (Year): 94 (2004) Issue (Month): 4 (September) Pages: 1141-1151 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Brunnermeier, Markus K & Parker, Jonathan A, 2004.
"Optimal Expectation,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
4656, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Markus K. Brunnermeier & Jonathan A. Parker, 2004.
"Optimal Expectations,"
NBER Working Papers
10707, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Markus K. Brunnermeier & Jonathan A. Parker, 2002.
"Optimal Expectations,"
Working Papers
146, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Discussion Papers in Economics..
[Downloadable!]
Markus K. Brunnermeier & Jonathan A. Parker, 2005.
"Optimal Expectations,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1092-1118, September.
[Downloadable!]
Olivier Compte & Andrew Postlewaite, 2001.
"Confidence-Enhanced Performance,"
PIER Working Paper Archive
04-023, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 01 May 2003.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
David Dickinson & Marie-Claire Villeval, 2007.
"The Peter Principle: An Experiment,"
Working Papers
0728, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique (GATE), Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Université Lyon 2, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
[Downloadable!]
Albert Banal-Estañol & Jo Seldeslachts, 2005.
"Merger Failures,"
CIG Working Papers
SP II 2005-09, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
[Downloadable!]