Top 25% Think Tanks, as of February 2012
This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the
RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on
EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by
RePEc, citation analysis performed by
CitEc and popularity data compiled by
LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click
here. Or see the
ranking FAQ.
These rankings take only into account institutions registered in
EDIRC and authors registered with the
RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Think Tanks, these are 148 institutions. Institutions need satisfy the following criteria to be included: Institutions listed as think tank on
EDIRC.
All institutions in this category.
Top 25% Think Tanks
Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Register at the
RePEc Author Service.
| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.07 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA) |
2 | 2.81 | Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany |
3 | 3.2 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London, United Kingdom |
4 | 3.81 | Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
5 | 4.93 | Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
6 | 5.11 | ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V., München, Germany |
7 | 6.34 | DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin, Germany |
8 | 6.5 | Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
9 | 7.7 | Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden |
10 | 9.38 | Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland |
11 | 10.87 | Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini, Italy |
12 | 13.33 | Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Tokyo, Japan |
13 | 13.83 | Centre d'études prospectives et d'informations internationales (CEPII), Paris, France |
14 | 14.29 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin, Ireland |
15 | 16.14 | American Enterprise Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
16 | 17.12 | Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), San Francisco, California (USA) |
17 | 17.3 | Bruegel, Bruxelles/Brussel, Belgium |
18 | 17.71 | W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan (USA) |
19 | 19.59 | Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen, Germany |
20 | 20.15 | Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow, Russia |
21 | 21.57 | Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg, Germany |
22 | 21.85 | C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto, Canada |
23 | 22.77 | Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), México, Mexico |
24 | 23.62 | EIM Business & Policy Research, Zoetermeer, Netherlands |
25 | 24.07 | Urban Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
26 | 26.87 | Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies (JIMS), Jerusalem, Israel |
27 | 26.88 | Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York (USA) |
28 | 26.97 | Motu: Economic & Public Policy Research, Wellington, New Zealand |
29 | 28.68 | Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos (ETLA), Helsinki, Finland |
30 | 29.58 | Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
31 | 30.61 | Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH), Halle, Germany |
32 | 31.94 | Manhattan Institute, New York, New York (USA) |
33 | 32.4 | Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus (VATT), Government of Finland, Helsinki, Finland |
34 | 33.37 | Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo (GRADE), Lima, Peru |
35 | 36.92 | The Conference Board, New York City, New York (USA) |
36 | 37.79 | CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research, Warszawa, Poland |
37 | 38.17 | Shadow Open Market Committee, Rochester, New York (USA) |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
- Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia, Spain.
- Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
- Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
- Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
- RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.
We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.
