IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Deutschlands Wirtschaft, seine Schulden und die Unzulänglichkeiten der einheitlichen Geldpolitik im Eurosystem
[Germany’s economy, its debts, and the shortcomings of the Eurosystem’s common monetary policy]

  • Spethmann, Dieter
  • Steiger, Otto
Registered author(s):

    In 2004, Germany became Europe’s ‘king of debt’ in absolute figures, thereby leaving behind even Italy, for decades the bearer of this awkward title. However, Germany’s rising public debt is not due to loose fiscal policy but the result of the common monetary policy in European Monetary Union (EMU). While Germany has the lowest rate of inflation in EMU, it has to pay the same nominal rate of interest as its competitors, that is, it has to shoulder the by far highest real rate of interest. This in turn has led to economic stagnation, with decreasing tax revenues and, in spite of huge efforts to reduce public expenditures, rising debts. As Germany is still the biggest economy in Europe, its stagnation has decisively contributed to EMU’s slow economic growth. According to the authors, the not so pleasant state of Euroland is due to the fact that EMU is not an ‘optimal currency area’ (Robert Mundell). EMU does not fulfil one of the most important criteria for optimality: the absence of tremendous differences between its member countries’ real rates of interest. In the paper, several measures of how to overcome the German problem are discussed, especially how to reconstruct the Eurosystem, the decentralised central banking system of EMU, to allow for a differentiated monetary policy, with high (low) nominal rates of interest for high (low) inflation countries. Drawing on a proposal by Erik Lindahl in 1930, this would mean to re-establish the European Central Bank (ECB) as the central monetary authority in the Eurosystem, with the monopoly to issue money. In spite of its name, the ECB is not a bank of issue, not to speak of being a lender of last resort, but only a co-ordinating agent between the Council of Governors of the Eurosystem, the decisive institution for monetary policy in EMU, and the twelve national central banks who alone issue the Euro. An alternative proposal discussed is to assign to the strongest central bank in the Eurosystem, the Bundesbank, the role of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in the Federal Reserve System, thereby transforming the Eurosystem into a European Reserve System of Federal States. However, the strengthening of the ECB, or the Bundesbank, needs the support of a central fiscal authority in EMU, a role which today’s EG Commission in Brussels cannot shoulder : it disposes only of a tiny amount of EMU’s aggregate tax revenues. The authors are aware of the political difficulties to re-organise the Eurosystem. However, if politicians shy away from such a reform, the only option for solving Germany’s stagnation should be to leave EMU.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Bonn, ZEI - Center for European Integration Studies in its series ZEI Working Papers with number B 29-2004.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2004
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:zeiwps:b292004
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Walter-Flex-Straße 3, D - 53113 Bonn

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zeiwps:b292004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.