IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhancing the Resilience of Microfinance Institutions and Programs: Lessons Learned from the Asian Financial Crisis


  • Seibel, Hans Dieter


The evidence from selected Asian countries shows that: * Microfinance on the whole has weathered the crisis well. The strongest of the microfinance systems in the region, the BRI unit system in Indonesia, has emerged from the crisis even stronger than before, characterized by a surge in savings deposits and continued excellent repayment performance. * Demand for microcredit has not increased; there are some cases, as in the BRI units, where it has declined; in other cases, as among some Grameen replicators in the Philippines, neither the demand for, nor the supply of, microcredit seem to be affected. The resilience of microfinance in crisis situations, just as in normal times, appears to be most strongly influenced by three major factors: * the institutional autonomy and self-reliance of MFIs in terms of internal resource mobilization and operational terms and conditions * negatively by financial repression, comprising interest rate regulation, a lack of legal forms for MFIs, and a preponderance of subsidized targeted program credit which in one form or the other has persisted in every country * positively by the deregulation of interest rates, institutional liberalization and the provision of appropriate legal forms for MFIs, accompanied by prudential regulation and effective supervision (the lack of which was a major factor in the downfall of the banking sector in the affected Asian countries).

Suggested Citation

  • Seibel, Hans Dieter, 1998. "Enhancing the Resilience of Microfinance Institutions and Programs: Lessons Learned from the Asian Financial Crisis," Working Papers 1998,4, University of Cologne, Development Research Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:uocaef:19984

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:uocaef:19984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.