IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ufzdps/328003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hurdles still outweigh opportunities for bioCDR

Author

Listed:
  • Matzner, Nils
  • Otto, Danny
  • Polzin, Christine
  • Hauck, Jennifer
  • Förster, Johannes
  • Wollnik, Ronja
  • Siedschlag, Daniela
  • Thrän, Daniela

Abstract

How are different processes for removing CO2 from the atmosphere perceived by stakeholders in different regions of Germany? This question was explored in workshops of the project BioNET ("Multistage assessment of biobased negative emission technologies")1 in order to beter understand the potential and challenges of biomass-based carbon dioxide removal (bioCDR) technologies. Experts from industry, agriculture, forestry, NGOs and policy were involved in four stakeholder workshops to discuss bioCDR measures, their regional characteristics and sociopolitical trust. The results show that bioCDR technologies such as afforestation, pyrolysis of biomass (PyCCS) and peatland rewetting are seen as promising, but face regulatory, economic and social barriers. While there are regional differences in feasibility, there are recurring challenges such as land competition, lack of political support and uncertainties in financing. Particular emphasis was placed on the importance of cascading use in order to maximize the efficiency of bioCDR. The "Carbon Cascadia" simulation game we developed supported the discussion on biomass cascades and long-term CO2 storage. The results highlight the need for targeted funding instruments and a coordinated policy framework, including citizen participation, in order to establish bioCDR in the long term. Without clear strategies and societal involvement, there is a risk that the potential of these technologies will remain untapped. The report provides valuable insights for research, policy and practice for the further development of bioCDR in Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Matzner, Nils & Otto, Danny & Polzin, Christine & Hauck, Jennifer & Förster, Johannes & Wollnik, Ronja & Siedschlag, Daniela & Thrän, Daniela, 2025. "Hurdles still outweigh opportunities for bioCDR," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2025, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:328003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/328003/1/1937615537.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:328003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/doufzde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.