IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/swprps/162019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cooperation, trust, security? The potential and limits of the OSCE's economic and environmental dimension

Author

Listed:
  • Smolnik, Franziska

Abstract

In the context of a European security order under pressure, the OSCE - and its long neglected economic and environmental dimension - has developed a new dynamism. The potential for generating trust in this area is attributed to the idea that economics and the environment are supposedly less sensitive issues to cooperate on. The assumption is that this trust can subsequently have a positive effect on cooperation in other fields, and contribute to greater security in Europe as a whole. In this regard, the results of this study suggest that we should manage expectations pragmatically: the chances of cooperation on OSCE "second-dimension" issues should be kept in perspective. A greater degree of intergovernmental cooperation does not automatically mean an increase in trust, nor does spillover between "low politics" and "high politics" necessarily occur. Alongside its EU partners, Germany should therefore pay particular attention as to how to upgrade the OSCE's economic and environmental dimension. Connections between the OSCE dimensions should be actively promoted; debates in the "second dimension" could be even more closely tied to the discussion on the crumbling basic consensus over rule-based order and common principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Smolnik, Franziska, 2019. "Cooperation, trust, security? The potential and limits of the OSCE's economic and environmental dimension," SWP Research Papers 16/2019, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:swprps:162019
    DOI: 10.18449/2019RP16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/253216/1/2019RP16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18449/2019RP16?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:swprps:162019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.swp-berlin.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.