IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/safepl/334514.html

Beyond environmental factors: What retail investors want from esg investing

Author

Listed:
  • Fadavi, Sara
  • Famulok, Jakob
  • Laudenbach, Christine
  • Lindner, Vincent

Abstract

The reform of the EU's sustainable finance framework, in particular the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), reopens a debate about ESG labels and their alignment with investor preferences and policy objectives. This paper provides novel evidence on the role of ESG exclusion criteria in retail investment decisions. Using survey and experimental data from 1,174 German retail investors, we show that exclusion-based preferences are central to how investors interpret and use ESG labels. Investors place significantly greater weight on social and governance exclusions than on environmental ones (S > G > E), with human rights, animal welfare, and corruption emerging as dominant concerns. Experimental evidence further demonstrates that only investors with strong altruistic values adjust their portfolios when provided with granular ESG information. Consequently, reforms to the sustainable framework should acknowledge the importance of social and governance exclusions and move towards granular labels, while being aware of the limits of sustainability labelling on the green transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Fadavi, Sara & Famulok, Jakob & Laudenbach, Christine & Lindner, Vincent, 2025. "Beyond environmental factors: What retail investors want from esg investing," SAFE Policy Letters 111, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:safepl:334514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/334514/1/1947738720.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel M. Hartzmark & Abigail B. Sussman, 2019. "Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(6), pages 2789-2837, December.
    2. Monica Billio & Michele Costola & Iva Hristova & Carmelo Latino & Loriana Pelizzon, 2021. "Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1426-1445, September.
    3. Armin Falk & Anke Becker & Thomas Dohmen & Benjamin Enke & David B. Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2017. "Global Evidence on Economic Preferences," NBER Working Papers 23943, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Andreoni, James, 1989. "Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(6), pages 1447-1458, December.
    5. Florian Heeb & Julian F Kölbel & Falko Paetzold & Stefan Zeisberger, 2023. "Do Investors Care about Impact?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(5), pages 1737-1787.
    6. Armin Falk & Anke Becker & Thomas Dohmen & Benjamin Enke & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2018. "Global Evidence on Economic Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(4), pages 1645-1692.
    7. Matthew J. Kotchen, 2006. "Green Markets and Private Provision of Public Goods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(4), pages 816-845, August.
    8. Rabab Abouarab & Tapas Mishra & Simon Wolfe, 2025. "Does the EU sustainable finance disclosure regulation mitigate greenwashing?," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 957-989, May.
    9. Annamaria Lusardi & Olivia S. Mitchell, 2017. "How Ordinary Consumers Make Complex Economic Decisions: Financial Literacy and Retirement Readiness," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(03), pages 1-31, September.
    10. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    11. Billio, Monica & Fitzpatrick, Aoife Claire & Latino, Carmelo & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2024. "Unpacking the ESG ratings: Does one size fit all?," SAFE Working Paper Series 415, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    12. Inderst, Roman & Opp, Marcus M., 2025. "Sustainable finance versus environmental policy: Does greenwashing justify a taxonomy for sustainable investments?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Famulok, Jakob & Kormanyos, Emily & Worring, Daniel, 2024. "Do investors use sustainable assets as carbon offsets?," SAFE Working Paper Series 431, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu Chen & Jiaqi Wang & Xiaolan Yang, 2026. "Pure Altruism or Warm-Glow Altruism? Altruistic Motivation and Gender Differences in Socially Responsible Investment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 127-144, February.
    2. Roman Kräussl & Tobi Oladiran & Denitsa Stefanova, 2024. "A review on ESG investing: Investors’ expectations, beliefs and perceptions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 476-502, April.
    3. Anderson, Anders & Robinson, David, 2024. "Climate Polarization and Green Investment," HoSS Working Paper Series 2024-15, Stockholm School of Economics, House of Sustainable Society (HoSS), revised 05 Feb 2024.
    4. Matthias Muck & Thomas Schmidl, 2026. "Relative to whom? The impact of peer groups on ESG ratings and financial performance," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Luz, Valentin & Schauer, Victor & Viehweger, Martin, 2024. "Beyond preferences: Beliefs in sustainable investing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 584-607.
    6. Janssen, Bennet & Zhang, Youpeng, 2025. "Do retail investors care about ESG ratings?," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-074, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Lars Hornuf & Christoph Merkle & Stefan Zeisberger, 2026. "Defaulting Investors Toward Sustainability: A Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 12733, CESifo.
    9. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Gibbon, Kayshani & Derwall, Jeroen & Gerritsen, Dirk & Koedijk, Kees, 2025. "Renaming with purpose: Investor response and fund manager behaviour after fund ESG renaming," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Li, Qianqian & Watts, Edward M. & Zhu, Christina, 2024. "Retail investors and ESG news," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2).
    12. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    13. Wang, Hu & Lian, Yuanqiang & Shen, Hong, 2025. "Does the self-holding behavior of fund managers foster fund sustainable investment?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Rau, Holger A., 2021. "Time preferences in decisions for others," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Kevin Birk & Stefan Jacob & Marco Wilkens, 2025. "What attracts sustainable fund flows? Prospectus versus ratings," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 216-237, March.
    16. Feldhaus, Christoph & Gleue, Marvin & Löschel, Andreas & Werner, Peter, 2022. "Co-benefits motivate individual donations to mitigate climate change," Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    17. Alfaro, Laura & Faia, Ester & Lamersdorf, Nora & Saidi, Farzad, 2024. "Altruism, social interactions, and the course of a pandemic," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Scheitza, Lisa & Busch, Timo, 2024. "SFDR Article 9: Is it all about impact?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    19. Rekha Pillai & Md. Aminul Islam & S. Sreejith & Husam Aldin Al-Malkawi, 2025. "Comparative analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings: do sectors and regions differ?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(1), pages 69-109, March.
    20. Shusaku Sasaki & Hirofumi Kurokawa & Fumio Ohtake, 2022. "An experimental comparison of rebate and matching in charitable giving: The case of Japan," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 147-177, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:safepl:334514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csafede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.