IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgw/p0002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enlarging the European Union: The short-term success of incrementalism and de-politicisation

Author

Listed:
  • Falkner, Gerda
  • Nentwich, Michael

Abstract

This paper analyses the most important issues of the EU enlargement process. We first discuss an empirical paradox involved in enlargement: the obvious development of the original European Communities into a Union with important supranational features and ever more policy clout has by no means discouraged aspirant member states. Why is it that more and more states are willing to give up much of their otherwise cherished national sovereignty by joining this Union, knowing that even more sovereignty will be eroded over time? Then we address the major challenges the EU has to face before actually widening any further, in particular concerning financial and institutional issues as well as internal and external boundaries. The concluding section discusses implicit and explicit EU enlargement strategies of past and present times. We argue that there is a danger that the incrementalist and de-politicised character of the recent enlargement (non-)discussions are successful only in the short term while actually being rather dangerous in the longer run.

Suggested Citation

  • Falkner, Gerda & Nentwich, Michael, 2000. "Enlarging the European Union: The short-term success of incrementalism and de-politicisation," MPIfG Working Paper 00/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:p0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/41701/1/639584179.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kochenov, Dimitry, 2005. "EU Enlargement Law: History and Recent Developments: Treaty Custom Concubinage?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 9, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:p0002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.