IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/323213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do not miss this ordonomic reply to our critics: Why social contract theory favors commercial over cooperative platforms in the sharing economy

Author

Listed:
  • Hielscher, Stefan
  • Everding, Sebastian
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

This discussion paper responds to the critique of our 2022 article "Ordo-Responsibility in the Sharing Economy: A Social Contracts Perspective" published in Business Ethics Quarterly. Ghirlanda and Sacconi (2024) argue that a properly understood version of constitutional contractarianism would favor platform cooperatives over commercial platforms. We respectfully disagree. Drawing on the ordonomic framework and Buchanan's contractarianism, we argue that commercial platforms provide a more efficient and legitimate governance model. Our reply addresses key methodological misunderstandings of social contract theory and substantiates our position with conceptual reasoning and empirical insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian & Pies, Ingo, 2025. "Do not miss this ordonomic reply to our critics: Why social contract theory favors commercial over cooperative platforms in the sharing economy," Discussion Papers 2025-05, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:323213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/323213/1/193147379X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:323213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.