IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/316430.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How can MNEs stabilize rent-sharing games in (fragile) limited access orders? An ordonomic perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Hielscher, Stefan
  • Mamorry, Hussein S.

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag untersucht, wie multinationale Unternehmen (MNUs) zur Stabilisierung sozialer Ordnungen beitragen können, die von North et al. (2013) als "fragile limited-access orders" (FLAOs) bezeichnet werden. Auf Basis der Theorieperspektive der Ordonomik analysiert der Beitrag, wie MNUs Wahrnehmungen beeinflussen und Anreizstrukturen gestalten können, um kooperative Rentenverteilungsarrangements unter Eliten zu fördern, die dazu beitragen, die systembedingte Instabilität in Entwicklungsländern zu verringern. Die zentrale, kontraintuitive These lautet, dass die funktionale Partizipation dominanter Eliten an innovativen Governance-Prozessen zur Aushandlung einer fairen Verteilung von Monopolrenten das Problem der Rentenverteilung von einer Quelle sozialen Konflikts und institutioneller Fragilität in eine Quelle sozialer Stabilität, Frieden und wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung transformieren kann. Dieser ordonomische Beitrag liefert somit nicht nur einen Beitrag zur Entwicklungsforschung, sondern auch zur Managementforschung, indem er die bislang wenig untersuchte Schnittmenge von MNUs, der Stabilisierung von FLAOs und den sogenannten "non-market strategies" adressiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Hielscher, Stefan & Mamorry, Hussein S., 2025. "How can MNEs stabilize rent-sharing games in (fragile) limited access orders? An ordonomic perspective," Discussion Papers 2025-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:316430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/316430/1/192387103X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ingo Pies & Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher, 2010. "Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 265-278, June.
    2. Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2014. "Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade‐Offs Into Win–Win Outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 18-37, January.
    3. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2009. "Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 375-401, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian, 2020. "Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 174-185.
    2. Felix Carl Schultz & Robert Jaroslav Reinhardt, 2022. "Facilitating systemic eco‐innovation to pave the way for a circular economy: A qualitative‐empirical study on barriers and drivers in the European polyurethane industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1646-1675, October.
    3. Felix Carl Schultz & Vladislav Valentinov & Robert Jaroslav Reinhardt & Ingo Pies, 2024. "The circular economy rebound effect: Reconceptualizing rebound approaches and mitigation opportunities from an ordonomic perspective," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 374-385, June.
    4. Will, Matthias Georg & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "How do companies invest in corporate social responsibility? An ordonomic contribution for empirical CSR research," Discussion Papers 2013-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristoleian idea of individual citizenship," Discussion Papers 2012-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    6. Ingo Pies & Philipp Schreck & Karl Homann, 2021. "Single-objective versus multi-objective theories of the firm: using a constitutional perspective to resolve an old debate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 779-811, April.
    7. Suchanek Andreas, 2012. "Unternehmensverantwortung als Vermeidung relevanter Inkonsistenzen / Corporate Responsibility: The Avoidance of Relevant Inconsistencies," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 63(1), pages 241-260, January.
    8. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Regelkonsens statt Wertekonsens: Die Grundidee des politischen Liberalismus," Discussion Papers 2011-20, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    9. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2022. "Stakeholder theory and the knowledge problem: A Hayekian perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 536-545.
    10. Pies, Ingo & Sass, Peter, 2011. "Wie sollte die Managementvergütung (nicht) reguliert werden? Ordnungspolitische Überlegungen zur Haftungsbeschränkung von und in Organisationen," Discussion Papers 2011-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    11. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2019. "Fighting corruption: How binding commitments of business firms can help to activate the self-regulating forces of competitive markets," Discussion Papers 2019-04, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    12. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Der ordonomische Ansatz: Eine Illustration am Beispiel des Mindestlohns," Discussion Papers 2014-17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    13. Vladislav Valentinov, 2017. "The Rawlsian Critique of Utilitarianism: A Luhmannian Interpretation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 25-35, April.
    14. Vladislav Valentinov & Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2016. "Emergence: A Systems Theory’s Challenge to Ethics," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 597-610, December.
    15. Hielscher, Stefan, 2011. "Vita consumenda oder Vita activa? Edmund Phelps und die moralische Qualität der Marktwirtschaft," Discussion Papers 2011-21, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    16. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "Gründe versus Anreize? Ein ordonomischer Werkstattbericht in sechs Thesen," Discussion Papers 2012-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "(Verhaltens-)Ökonomik versus (Ordnungs-)Ethik? Zum moralischen Stellenwert von Dispositionen und Institutionen," Discussion Papers 2013-22, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    18. Matthias Georg Will & Stefan Hielscher, 2014. "How do Companies Invest in Corporate Social Responsibility? An Ordonomic Contribution for Empirical CSR Research," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, July.
    19. Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2014. "Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade‐Offs Into Win–Win Outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 18-37, January.
    20. Will, Matthias Georg & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "How do companies invest in corporate social responsibility? An ordonomic contribution for empirical CSR research," Discussion Papers 2012-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:316430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.