IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse14/101407.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why has a homegrown technology failed: A case study on WiBro in the Korean telecommunication market

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Jieun
  • Kim, Seongcheol
  • Nam, Changi

Abstract

This study identifies and analyzes the causes for WiBro's failure in the Korean telecommunications market within the context of the technological systems framework and the actor-network theory. The reverse salients of WiBro were identified according to the activities of the actors from three different domains: technology, government, and business. The findings and implication of this study were obtained through a review of the literature and in-depth interviews with eight key experts. The reverse salients found can be categorized into two types: 'apparent' and 'underlying.' The apparent reverse salients are the lack of investment and inadequate business model of the business actors. The underlying reverse salients are the policies enacted by government actors and are less obvious but heavily influence the creation of the apparent reverse salients and ultimately contribute to the failure of WiBro.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Jieun & Kim, Seongcheol & Nam, Changi, 2014. "Why has a homegrown technology failed: A case study on WiBro in the Korean telecommunication market," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101407, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse14:101407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/101407/1/795360363.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse14:101407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.