IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Using quality information is analysis - with experiment

  • Galli, Richard
Registered author(s):

    Using quality information for analysis, or staying with just quantity based information is always a good base for debate: Either relying on quantitative measurements and data (which is sad to be more accurate and easier to rely on) or use quantitative measurements (which is sad to be human / easier to understand and answer). In both ways the collected data will require further processing to be used in decision-making. An experiment was made on customer satisfaction on an imaginary service. The service was a web based TTS (Text-To-Speech) software test. Of course, all the voices were pre-recorded, so the participants were all chosen not to realize that (every member with low IT knowledge). After the end of the reading everyone had to answer a few questions regarding the quality. Group A had to answer the questions (which were sounding more scientific) with numbers related the current measure - help provided if needed. Group B had to answer the same questions with open answers, as they like.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/52174/1/672464772.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by International Telecommunications Society (ITS) in its series 22nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications - Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues with number 52174.

    as
    in new window

    Length:
    Date of creation: 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse11:52174
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.itseurope.org/

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse11:52174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.