IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkie/318073.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring Site‐Specific Carbon Dioxide Removal Options With Storage or Sequestration in the Marine Environment – The 10 Mt CO₂ yr⁻¹ Removal Challenge for Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, W.
  • Morganti, T. M.
  • Wu, J.
  • Borchers, M.
  • Anschütz, A.
  • Bednarz, L.‐K.
  • Bhaumik, A.
  • Böttcher, M.
  • Burkhard, K.
  • Cabus, T.
  • Chua, A. S.
  • Diercks, I.
  • Esposito, M.
  • Fink, M.
  • Fouqueray, M.
  • Gasanzade, F.
  • Geilert, S.
  • Hauck, J.
  • Havermann, F.
  • Hellige, I.
  • Hoog, S.
  • Jürchott, M.
  • Kalapurakkal, H. T.
  • Kemper, J.
  • Kremin, I.
  • Lange, I.
  • Lencina‐Avila, J. M.
  • Liadova, M.
  • Liu, F.
  • Mathesius, S.
  • Mehendale, N.
  • Nagwekar, T.
  • Philippi, M.
  • Luz, G. L. N.
  • Ramasamy, M.
  • Stahl, F.
  • Tank, L.
  • Vorrath, M.‐E.
  • Westmark, L.
  • Wey, H.‐W.
  • Wollnik, R.
  • Wölfelschneider, M.
  • Bach, W.
  • Bischof, K.
  • Boersma, M.
  • Daewel, U.
  • Fernández‐Méndez, M.
  • Geuer, J. K.
  • Keller, D. P.
  • Kopf, A.
  • Merk, C.
  • Moosdorf, N.
  • Oppelt, N.
  • Oschlies, A.
  • Pongratz, J.
  • Proelss, A.
  • Rehder, G. J.
  • Rüpke, L.
  • Szarka, N.
  • Thraen, D.
  • Wallmann, K.
  • Mengis, N.

Abstract

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) and geological carbon storage in the marine environment (mCS) promise to help mitigate global climate change alongside drastic emission reductions. However, the implementable potential of mCDR and mCS depends, apart from technology readiness, also on site-specific conditions. In this work, we explore different options for mCDR and mCS, using the German context as a case study. We challenge each option to remove 10 Mt CO₂ yr⁻¹, accounting for 8%–22% of projected hard-to-abate and residual emissions of Germany in 2045. We focus on the environmental, resource, and infrastructure requirements of individual mCDR and mCS options at specific sites, within the German jurisdiction when possible. This serves as an entry point to discuss main uncertainty factors and research needs beyond technology readiness, and, where possible, cost estimates, expected environmental effects, and monitoring approaches. In total, we describe 10 mCDR and mCS options; four aim at enhancing the chemical carbon uptake of the ocean through alkalinity enhancement, four aim at enhancing blue carbon ecosystems' sink capacity, and two employ geological off‐shore storage. Our results indicate that five out of 10 options would potentially be implementable within German jurisdiction, and three of them could potentially meet the challenge. Our exercise serves as an example on how the creation of more tangible and site-specific CDR options can provide a basis for the assessment of socio-economic, ethical, political, and legal aspects for such implementations. The approach presented here can easily be applied to other regional or national CDR capacity considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, W. & Morganti, T. M. & Wu, J. & Borchers, M. & Anschütz, A. & Bednarz, L.‐K. & Bhaumik, A. & Böttcher, M. & Burkhard, K. & Cabus, T. & Chua, A. S. & Diercks, I. & Esposito, M. & Fink, M. & Fouque, 2025. "Exploring Site‐Specific Carbon Dioxide Removal Options With Storage or Sequestration in the Marine Environment – The 10 Mt CO₂ yr⁻¹ Removal Challenge for Germany," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 318073, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:318073
    DOI: 10.1029/2024EF004902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/318073/1/Earths-Future-2025-Yao-Exploring-Site%e2%80%90Specific-Carbon-Dioxide-Removal-Options.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1029/2024EF004902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:318073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.