IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/309.html

A comment on "Overperception of moral outrage in online social networks inflates beliefs about intergroup hostility"

Author

Listed:
  • Carriere, Kevin R.

Abstract

Brady et al. (2023) investigated whether people overperceive moral outrage in social media and whether exposure to outrage-saturated newsfeeds amplifies perceived collective outrage and intergroup hostility across five studies. Participants who viewed the high-overperception feed judged the collective outrage of their social network as substantially large. They also found that exposure to highly overperceived feeds increased perceived social appropriateness, increased affective polarization, and heightened perceived ideological extremity. In this commentary, I successfully computationally reproduce all reported effects even after correcting a data-processing error that unintentionally duplicated observations in Studies 1-3, including the large between-condition difference in perceived collective outrage (Study 4). Bootstrapping 2,000 resamples confirmed that the 95% bias-corrected and accelerated CI [2.09, 2.51] matches the analytic interval, indicating an exceptionally stable effect. I also replicate Study 5 using tweet-level mixed-effects models that preserve the nested structure of the data. These reanalyses reproduce the main effects of overperceived feeds on social appropriateness (b = 0.67, p

Suggested Citation

  • Carriere, Kevin R., 2026. "A comment on "Overperception of moral outrage in online social networks inflates beliefs about intergroup hostility"," I4R Discussion Paper Series 309, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/342979/1/I4R-DP309.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.