IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/238.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Replication Report on "Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections" by Flamino et al. 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Knöpfle, Philipp
  • Haim, Mario
  • Breuer, Johannes

Abstract

Flamino et al. (2023) estimate the levels of ideological polarization and echo chamber behavior for Twitter (now X) users during the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections using political bias classification and network analysis methods. Using 873 million tweets, they find a decline in the proportion of fake and extremely biased content but identify an increase in echo chamber behaviors and latent ideological polarization among both users and influencers over the investigated period. Using the Twitter data and analysis code provided in the complementary OSF.io repository, we successfully reproduced the results of their analysis with only minor deviations due to small technical adjustments. In general, social media analyses frequently blur the distinction between reproduction and replication due to the dynamic nature of platform data and changing access policies resulting in difficulties retrieving consistent datasets over time. Hence, we conducted a robustness check by querying the Twitter/X Batch Compliance API to evaluate how many tweets from the initial dataset remain accessible today. Our "rehydration" attempts exposed substantial limitations in the Twitter/X API, as data retrieval issues arose across both free and paid access tiers, preventing us from re-collecting the original dataset or obtaining reliable estimates of tweet accessibility from the original study. While the study was largely reproducible with the intermediary and aggregated data provided, its full reproducibility and replicability are constrained by restrictive social media platform data access policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Knöpfle, Philipp & Haim, Mario & Breuer, Johannes, 2025. "A Replication Report on "Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections" by Flamino et al. 2023," I4R Discussion Paper Series 238, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/319836/1/I4R-DP238.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Breuer & Mario Haim, 2024. "Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    2. Brittany I. Davidson & Darja Wischerath & Daniel Racek & Douglas A. Parry & Emily Godwin & Joanne Hinds & Dirk Linden & Jonathan F. Roscoe & Laura Ayravainen & Alicia G. Cork, 2023. "Platform-controlled social media APIs threaten open science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(12), pages 2054-2057, December.
    3. Philipp Knöpfle & Tim Schatto-Eckrodt, 2024. "The Challenges of Replicating Volatile Platform-Data Studies: Replicating Schatto-Eckrodt et al. (2020)," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    4. James Flamino & Alessandro Galeazzi & Stuart Feldman & Michael W. Macy & Brendan Cross & Zhenkun Zhou & Matteo Serafino & Alexandre Bovet & Hernán A. Makse & Boleslaw K. Szymanski, 2023. "Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 904-916, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casas, Andreu & Dagher, Georgia & O'Loughlin, Ben, 2025. "Academic Access to Social Media Data for the Study of Political Online Safety," SocArXiv 7pcjd, Center for Open Science.
    2. Xenia Schmalz & Johannes Breuer & Mario Haim & Andrea Hildebrandt & Philipp Knöpfle & Anna Yi Leung & Timo Roettger, 2025. "Let’s talk about language—and its role for replicability," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-6, December.
    3. Douglas Cordeiro & Carlos Lopezosa & Javier Guallar, 2025. "A Methodological Framework for AI-Driven Textual Data Analysis in Digital Media," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-26, February.
    4. David Hartmann & Sonja Mei Wang & Lena Pohlmann & Bettina Berendt, 2025. "A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 1-59, May.
    5. Jinghua Piao & Fang Zhang & Tianpei Ren & Fengli Xu & Jinglei Zhou & Jun Su & Peng Ru & Yong Li, 2025. "Polarization of public opinions on feminism in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.