IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/229.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comment on "The Association between Vaccination Status Identification and Societal Polarization", Henkel et al. (2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Barrafrem, Kinga
  • Koppel, Lina
  • Lindkvist, Amanda M.

Abstract

Henkel et al. (2023) investigate the relationship between identification with one's vaccination status against COVID-19 and various measures of societal polarization. They find that vaccination status identification (VSI) moderates the relationship between vaccination status and (1) perception of public discourse, (2) perception of being discriminated against, (3) perceived ostracism, (4) ingroup preference in Dictator Game donations, (5) reactance to a vaccination mandate, and (6) self-reported engagement in activism against the mandate. First, we reproduce the paper's main findings in both R (using the original code as well as new code) and Stata, without any errors that affect the study's main results. Second, we conduct sensitivity analyses where we (1) account for the fact that some respondents change vaccination status (using panel regressions with fixed effects) and (2) conduct logistic regressions (instead of linear regressions) on the two binary outcome variables. Results are mostly in line with the original findings, except in the fixed effects models where the interaction between vaccination status and VSI was not significant for some of the outcome variables. However, this could also result from a lower number of observations in these regressions.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrafrem, Kinga & Koppel, Lina & Lindkvist, Amanda M., 2025. "A Comment on "The Association between Vaccination Status Identification and Societal Polarization", Henkel et al. (2023)," I4R Discussion Paper Series 229, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/318263/1/I4R-DP229.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.