IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

DIAKONIE und DRG's: Antagonistisch oder vereinbar?

Listed author(s):
  • Held, Bärbel
  • Held, Claus-Peter
Registered author(s):

    Im Reformprozess der evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland sind zwölf Handlungsfelder (Leuchtfeuer) herausgearbeitet worden, die diesen maßgeblich beeinflussen. Das achte Handlungsfeld ist die Diakonie und besitzt für die Kirche eine herausgehobene Bedeutung. Dies trifft auch auf die katholischen Einrichtungen zu. Die Einbindung der karitativen Arbeit in die Gestaltung des Sozialstaates macht diakonisches und karitatives Handeln von politischen Entscheidungen abhängig. Kirchliche Krankenhäuser müssen heute genauso im Wettbewerb des Gesundheitsmarktes bestehen wie staatlich geführte oder private Krankenhäuser. Ist dies unter den Bedingungen des Target Costings, wie sie die DRG's darstellen ein antagonistischer Widerspruch oder vereinbar? Diese Problematik soll mit der Entwicklung eines geeigneten Performance-Managementmodels unter theoretischer Bezugsnahme auf das Stakeholder-Ansatz-Konzept, eingebettet in die Systemtheorie, untersucht werden.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (OTH) in its series Weidener Diskussionspapiere with number 19.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2009
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:hawdps:19
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hawdps:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.