IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/glodps/1847.html

Does Maternal Early Marriage Influence Gender Bias in Child Well-Being?

Author

Listed:
  • Javed, Rashid
  • Mughal, Mazhar
  • Lorey, Thierry
  • Fontan Sers, Charlotte

Abstract

Early-marrying women are shown to exhibit a greater preference for sons. In this study, we examine whether, and to what extent, the preferential treatment of boys in early childhood is associated with the practice of early female marriage in Pakistan. Analyzing pooled data on 167,151 children born to 45,260 women between 1952 and 2018, we employ fixed-effects and instrumental-variable strategies to provide evidence of a lack of gender-specific differences in healthcare and development outcomes between children below age five born to early- and late-marrying women. We consider a broad set of outcomes related to (1) perinatal care (home delivery, child weight at birth, and miscarriage), (2) child healthcare (postnatal checkups, completion of vaccination courses, vitamin A intake, and treatment of cough or diarrhea), (3) nutrition (duration of breastfeeding, consumption of meat and fish, and consumption of fruits), and (4) early childhood development (stunting, underweight, wasting, and infant and child mortality). Our findings indicate that the association between maternal age at marriage and child outcomes is not gender-specific. Preferential treatment of sons-whether in terms of perinatal or postnatal care, access to nutritious food, or healthcare-does not depend on the mother's age at marriage. This effect holds regardless of the boy's birth order or family sex composition, nor does it vary with the mother's birth cohort, education, location, or household wealth status. Demographic transition also appears to play no role. Similarly, the father's age at marriage has little impact. However, we find some evidence that boys born to early-marrying women are more likely to survive past their fifth birthday compared to girls. This effect is particularly pronounced for children of women who married before age 16 and those whose husbands married before age 18. We conduct extensive sensitivity analyses and robustness checks to address potential concerns related to gender-specific recall bias, self-selection, and sex-selective abortion. We also obtain estimates using an alternative definition of early marriage, as well as different estimators, datasets, and estimation techniques, all of which confirm the robustness of our baseline findings. These findings underscore the persistence of patriarchal social norms that continue to reward women with greater agency for bearing sons.

Suggested Citation

  • Javed, Rashid & Mughal, Mazhar & Lorey, Thierry & Fontan Sers, Charlotte, 2026. "Does Maternal Early Marriage Influence Gender Bias in Child Well-Being?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1847, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/344296/1/GLO-DP-1847.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D13 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Production and Intrahouse Allocation
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/glabode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.