IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/glodps/1702r.html

Beyond lockdowns: working from home and mental health across three phases of the pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Bilgrami, Anam

Abstract

During and shortly after the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns were expressed that working from home (WFH) was creating a 'mental health crisis'. Australia experienced a three-phase 'WFH experiment', with widespread high-intensity WFH imposed by lockdowns in 2020, deepened restrictions in 2021, and a transition to flexible work arrangements and more autonomy in 2022 as vaccination rates increased. Using eight waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey and a within-person event-study specification with 2019 as the reference year, this study estimates how the relationship between WFH and self-reported worker mental health varied across these three phases. The findings show that WFH was associated with a modest, statistically significant deterioration in average worker mental health during the lockdown years (2020-2021), particularly among women. By 2022, the negative associations were no longer detectable on average, with a positive mental health association for workers WFH 25-50% of the time. This pattern is consistent with the lockdown-period results reflecting the broader conditions under which WFH occurred, rather than WFH itself. The main exception is workers with low job control, who continued to show a negative relationship between WFH and mental health in 2022. The findings point to job autonomy as a potentially important margin for designing sustainable hybrid work arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilgrami, Anam, 2026. "Beyond lockdowns: working from home and mental health across three phases of the pandemic," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1702 [rev.], Global Labor Organization (GLO).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1702r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341502/1/GLO-DP-1702rev.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1702r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/glabode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.