IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/glodps/1702r.html

Beyond lockdowns: working from home and mental health across three phases of the pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Bilgrami, Anam

Abstract

During and shortly after the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns were expressed that working from home (WFH) was creating a 'mental health crisis'. Australia experienced a three-phase 'WFH experiment', with widespread high-intensity WFH imposed by lockdowns in 2020, deepened restrictions in 2021, and a transition to flexible work arrangements and more autonomy in 2022 as vaccination rates increased. Using eight waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey and a within-person event-study specification with 2019 as the reference year, this study estimates how the relationship between WFH and self-reported worker mental health varied across these three phases. The findings show that WFH was associated with a modest, statistically significant deterioration in average worker mental health during the lockdown years (2020-2021), particularly among women. By 2022, the negative associations were no longer detectable on average, with a positive mental health association for workers WFH 25-50% of the time. This pattern is consistent with the lockdown-period results reflecting the broader conditions under which WFH occurred, rather than WFH itself. The main exception is workers with low job control, who continued to show a negative relationship between WFH and mental health in 2022. The findings point to job autonomy as a potentially important margin for designing sustainable hybrid work arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilgrami, Anam, 2026. "Beyond lockdowns: working from home and mental health across three phases of the pandemic," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1702 [rev.], Global Labor Organization (GLO).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1702r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341502/1/GLO-DP-1702rev.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritsu KITAGAWA & Sachiko KURODA & Hiroko OKUDAIRA & Hideo OWAN, 2021. "Working from Home: Its Effects on Productivity and Mental Health," Discussion papers 21024, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    2. Bertoni, Marco & Cavapozzi, Danilo & Pasini, Giacomo & Pavese, Caterina, 2025. "The causal effect of working from home on mental health of 50+ Europeans," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    3. Milner, Allison & Krnjacki, Lauren & Butterworth, Peter & LaMontagne, Anthony D., 2016. "The role of social support in protecting mental health when employed and unemployed: A longitudinal fixed-effects analysis using 12 annual waves of the HILDA cohort," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 20-26.
    4. Guillaume Gueguen & Claudia Senik, 2023. "Adopting telework: The causal impact of working from home on subjective well‐being," Post-Print halshs-04192717, HAL.
    5. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769, December.
    6. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D’Haultfœuille, 2026. "Difference-in-Differences Estimators of Intertemporal Treatment Effects," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 108(4), pages 863-880, July.
    7. Stobart, Anika & Duckett, Stephen, 2022. "Australia's Response to COVID-19," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 95-106, January.
    8. Guillaume Gueguen & Claudia Senik, 2023. "Adopting telework: The causal impact of working from home on subjective well‐being," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(4), pages 832-868, December.
    9. Paul Frijters & David W. Johnston & Michael A. Shields, 2014. "The Effect Of Mental Health On Employment: Evidence From Australian Panel Data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(9), pages 1058-1071, September.
    10. Kong, Nancy & Lam, Jack, 2024. "Physical isolation and loneliness: Evidence from COVID lock-downs in Australia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 598-623.
    11. Milner, A. & Krnjacki, L. & Butterworth, P. & Kavanagh, A. & LaMontagne, Anthony D., 2015. "Does disability status modify the association between psychosocial job quality and mental health? A longitudinal fixed-effects analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 104-111.
    12. Guillaume Gueguen & Claudia Senik, 2023. "Adopting telework: The causal impact of working from home on subjective well‐being," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-04192717, HAL.
    13. Kazekami, Sachiko, 2020. "Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    14. Younghwan Song & Jia Gao, 2020. "Does Telework Stress Employees Out? A Study on Working at Home and Subjective Well-Being for Wage/Salary Workers," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(7), pages 2649-2668, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilgrami, Anam, 2026. "Beyond lockdowns: work-from-home, mental health, and the moderating roles of intensity, job control and social support," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1702, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Mehrzad B. Baktash, 2026. "Home Alone: Work from Home and Loneliness," Research Papers in Economics 2026-04, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    3. Bilgrami, A., 2023. "Working from home and mental health: before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 23/03, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Bilgrami, Anam, 2023. "Working from home and mental health: Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1265, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    5. Benjamin W. Cowan & Todd R. Jones, 2025. "Social Substitution? Time Use Responses to Increased Workplace Isolation," CESifo Working Paper Series 12117, CESifo.
    6. Jirjahn, Uwe & Rienzo, Cinzia, 2025. "Working from Home and Mental Health: Giving Employees a Choice Does Make a Difference," IZA Discussion Papers 18187, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Cowan, Benjamin & Jones, Todd R., 2025. "Social Substitution? Time Use Responses to Increased Workplace Isolation," IZA Discussion Papers 18112, IZA Network @ LISER.
    8. Yue Qian & Wen Fan, 2026. "Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Make It Worse? Working from Home and Affective Well-Being at the Intersections of Parental Status and Occupation," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 79(2), pages 310-332, March.
    9. Hennecke, Juliane & Knabe, Andreas, 2025. "Homebound Happiness? Teleworkability of Jobs and Emotional Well-Being During Labor and Non-labor Activities," IZA Discussion Papers 17634, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Bertoni, Marco & Cavapozzi, Danilo & Pasini, Giacomo & Pavese, Caterina, 2025. "The causal effect of working from home on mental health of 50+ Europeans," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    11. Philippe Askenazy & Ugo Di Nallo & Ismaël Ramajo & Conrad Thiounn, 2025. "Teleworking in the French private sector: a lasting but heterogenous shift shaped by collective agreements (2019- 2024)," Working Papers hal-05291266, HAL.
    12. Claudia Senik & Andrew E. Clark & Conchita D’Ambrosio & Anthony Lepinteur & Carsten Schröder, 2024. "Teleworking and life satisfaction during COVID-19: the importance of family structure," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Kayoko Ishii & Isamu Yamamoto, 2025. "Correction: Trends in Income and Well-Being Inequality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 583-591, August.
    14. Anna Kurowska & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska & Tsegachew Degu Kasegn & Bartłomiej Rokicki, 2025. "Life and Work-life Balance Satisfaction Among Parents Working From Home: the Role of Work-time and Childcare Demands," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 1315-1338, June.
    15. Fernandes, Ana P. & Duanmu, Jing-Lin, 2025. "Foreign banks and firms’ export dynamics: Evidence from China’s banking reform," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Dominika Langenmayr & Mikayel Tovmasyan & Sebastian Vosseler, 2025. "Bypassing Sanctions: Hide 'N Seek in Tax Havens?," Working Papers 202536, Center for Global Policy Analysis, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
    17. Adrian Farner Rogne & Agnes Fauske & Rannveig Kaldager Hart, 2025. "Educational Expansions and Fertility: Evidence from Norwegian College Reforms," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 41(1), pages 1-30, December.
    18. Nadezda Krasilnikova & Meike Levin-Keitel, 2022. "Telework as a Game-Changer for Sustainability? Transitions in Work, Workplace and Socio-Spatial Arrangements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Roth, Jonathan & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Bilinski, Alyssa & Poe, John, 2023. "What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2218-2244.
    20. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2026. "Estimating Causal Effects With Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 356-382, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1702r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/glabode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.