IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fauebm/142020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

"Digitale Souveränität": Kontextualisierung des Phänomens in der Domäne der medial vermittelten öffentlichen Kommunikation unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Reader Analytics

Author

Listed:
  • Hagenhoff, Svenja

Abstract

The term 'digital sovereignty' is increasingly used in the context of the discussion about 'digital transformation'. Sovereignty in the digital world is considered a prerequisite for being able to help shape the digital transformation in all functional areas of society. However, the term 'digital sovereignty' has so far been used primarily in a prescriptive-normative sense; a differentiated theoretical work and concrete contextualizations for different social functional areas are still a desideratum. This working paper therefore sets itself the task of contextualizing the idea of digital sovereignty in the domain of public communication mediated by the media: The question arises where exactly sovereignty as a specific object of investigation in media society and media communication plays a role. This requires a conceptual-abstract version that goes beyond the mere enumeration of obvious phenomena or normatively influenced demands ('freedom of opinion', 'informational self-determination').

Suggested Citation

  • Hagenhoff, Svenja, 2020. ""Digitale Souveränität": Kontextualisierung des Phänomens in der Domäne der medial vermittelten öffentlichen Kommunikation unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Reader Analytics," Erlangen Contributions to Media Management and Media Economics 14/2020, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Institute for the Study of the Book, Professorship of E-Publishing and Digital Markets.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fauebm:142020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/227582/1/1742343953.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Informationsfreiheit; Lesen; Medienökonomie; Reader Analytics; Souveränität;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fauebm:142020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://buchwissenschaft.phil.fau.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.