Author
Abstract
Geopolitical tensions between China and Japan may influence regional travel preferences, destination perceptions, and public discussions about tourism in East Asia. Against this background, South Korea represents a relevant case for examining how international political developments intersect with perceptions of tourism overcrowding, destination saturation, and social conflict. This study presents a multilingual text-mining analysis of 15,000 online comments, comprising 5,000 Chinese-language comments, 5,000 Japanese-language comments, and 5,000 Korean-language comments. The study examines how commenters discuss Chinese tourism to South Korea, whether geopolitical tensions are associated with changing destination preferences, and how tourism-related concerns differ across the three language communities. The research design combined multilingual text preprocessing, frequency analysis, keyword co-occurrence networks, sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and content coding. The coding framework included geopolitical tensions, travel substitution, tourist overcrowding, infrastructure pressure, resident inconvenience, economic benefits, cultural conflict, anti-tourist sentiment, and destination-management responses. The results indicate that Chinese-language comments emphasized travel opportunities and destination accessibility, Japanese-language comments discussed regional political relations and comparative destination preferences, and Korean-language comments focused more heavily on urban congestion, resident inconvenience, and the economic implications of inbound tourism. These patterns were derived from the analysis of the 15,000 collected comments. The study provides a framework for investigating how geopolitical discourse and tourism saturation perceptions interact across languages, while emphasizing the need to distinguish verified political developments from online speculation and to avoid equating the views of individual commenters with those of entire national populations.geopolitical discourse and tourism saturation perceptions interact across languages, while emphasizing the need to distinguish verified political developments from online speculation and to avoid equating the views of individual commenters with those of entire national populations.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esrepo:344261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.