IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Open Access and Open Assessment: The Future of Peer Reviewed Journals? Experiences with a New Journal in Economics

Listed author(s):
  • Siegert, Olaf
  • Werner-Schwarz, Korinna

Open Access Journals have become more and more popular as a publishing model for academic scholars. There are already more than 3,500 of them listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). To establish these journals as a relevant and trustful source for validated research results (and as an alternative to licensed publisher-based journals), peer review is a necessary requisite. The Internet offers new ways to organize the peer review process. It allows for example comments and ratings from readers of freely available papers and articles. So far only a few Journals use these Open Assessment methods. The presentation will showcase “Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal” as one prime example. “Economics”, as the name indicates, covers papers from all parts of Economic Research. These papers, if accepted, are first published as Discussion Papers and then, after a successful evalution both by invited referees and by registered readers, as Journal Articles. The peer review stands in the centre of the journal, as its main goal is to be recognized as one of the top journals in its field. Therefore the traditional peer review process is substantially supplemented by a "public" peer review process in which the community of active researchers from all over the world has a hand in the evaluation process. After registering with the journal they can share their views in two ways. Either by commenting on the Discussion Papers in review or by rating the final Journal Articles. Within one year of existence, almost 1,800 researchers have registered with the journal. They are based all over the world including wellknown institutions like the American ivy league universities, the World Bank or the London School of Economics (LSE). After a slow start more and more comments and reviews are added to new papers, with now about four comments per paper. Even if the Article rating is less used so far, the overall picture is quite optimistic: Researchers are taking the chance of Open Assessment in Academic Journals, especially, if a critical mass of peers are following the same path.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by ZBW - German National Library of Economics in its series EconStor Preprints with number 49530.

in new window

Date of creation: 2009
Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:49530
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Düsternbrooker Weg 120, 24105 Kiel / Neuer Jungfernstieg 21, 20354 Hamburg

Phone: +49 431 8814-1
Fax: +49 431 8814-520
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:49530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.