Author
Abstract
The increasing urgency of environmental sustainability has made green logistics and decarbonization strategies central to modern supply chain management. Green logistics focuses on minimizing the environmental impact of transportation, warehousing, and distribution activities by integrating energy-efficient technologies, optimizing routes, and promoting sustainable packaging solutions. Decarbonization strategies, on the other hand, aim to reduce carbon dioxide emissions across the entire supply chain, encompassing production, procurement, transportation, and end-of-life processes. This study evaluates the economic efficiency and environmental outcomes of implementing such strategies in firms of varying sizes and sectors. A mixed-method approach, combining quantitative analysis of cost and emission data with qualitative assessments from industry experts, was employed. The findings indicate that while the initial investment in green technologies and low-carbon logistics solutions may increase operational costs in the short term, the long-term economic benefits, including energy savings, improved operational efficiency, and enhanced brand reputation, outweigh these expenditures. Furthermore, significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption were observed, demonstrating that sustainability initiatives contribute not only to environmental preservation but also to competitive advantage in the marketplace. The study also highlights the role of policy support, stakeholder engagement, and digital technologies, such as data-driven monitoring and artificial intelligence-based route optimization, in enhancing the effectiveness of green logistics and decarbonization efforts. The results provide actionable insights for managers, policymakers, and researchers seeking to balance economic performance with ecological responsibility. Overall, the integration of green logistics and decarbonization strategies is presented as a viable pathway toward sustainable and resilient supply chain operations, promoting both corporate profitability and environmental stewardship.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:344610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.