IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/72007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wie wirksam sind neue Modalitäten der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit? Erste Erfahrungen mit Programme-Based Approaches (PBAs)

Author

Listed:
  • Klingebiel, Stephan
  • Leiderer, Stefan
  • Schmidt, Petra

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Klingebiel, Stephan & Leiderer, Stefan & Schmidt, Petra, 2007. "Wie wirksam sind neue Modalitäten der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit? Erste Erfahrungen mit Programme-Based Approaches (PBAs)," IDOS Discussion Papers 7/2007, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:72007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199268/1/die-dp-2007-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Rogerson, 2005. "Aid Harmonisation and Alignment: Bridging the Gaps between Reality and the Paris Reform Agenda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 23(5), pages 531-552, September.
    2. Schmidt, Petra, 2005. "Budgethilfe in der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit der EU," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 10, number 10.
    3. Paolo de Renzio, 2006. "Aid, Budgets and Accountability: A Survey Article," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 627-645, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Dornan, 2017. "How new is the ‘new’ conditionality? Recipient perspectives on aid, country ownership and policy reform," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 46-63, July.
    2. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Institutional bypass and aid effectiveness in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-22, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Martin Knoll, 2008. "Budget Support: A Reformed Approach Or Old Wine In New Skins?," UNCTAD Discussion Papers 190, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    4. Niels Keijzer & David Black, 2020. "Special issue introduction Ownership in a post‐aid effectiveness era: Comparative perspectives," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Klein, Thomas M., 2007. "Performance-Management in der humanitären Hilfe und internationalen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit," ÖFSE-Forum, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), volume 33, number 33.
    6. Hopper, Trevor & Lassou, Philippe & Soobaroyen, Teerooven, 2017. "Globalisation, accounting and developing countries," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 125-148.
    7. Rik Habraken & Lau Schulpen & Paul Hoebink, 2017. "Putting promises into practice: The New Aid Architecture in Uganda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(6), pages 779-795, November.
    8. Knack, Stephen & Smets, Lodewijk, 2013. "Aid Tying and Donor Fragmentation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 63-76.
    9. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Bypassing Government: Aid Effectiveness and Malawi’s Local Development Fund," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 103-116.
    10. Rosemary McGee, 2013. "Aid Transparency and Accountability: ‘Build It and They'll Come’?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31, pages 107-124, July.
    11. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    12. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    13. Haley J. Swedlund & Malte Lierl, 2020. "The rise and fall of budget support: Ownership, bargaining and donor commitment problems in foreign aid," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 50-69, May.
    14. Lassou, Philippe J.C. & Hopper, Trevor & Ntim, Collins, 2021. "How the colonial legacy frames state audit institutions in Benin that fail to curb corruption," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Matthew Morris & Jonathan Pryke, 2011. "Beyond Paris: 11 innovations in aid effectiveness," Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers 1110, Development Policy Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    16. Stephen Brown, 2016. "Putting Paris into practice: Foreign aid, national ownership, and donor alignment in Mali and Ghana," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-145, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Pallas, Sarah Wood & Ruger, Jennifer Prah, 2017. "Effects of donor proliferation in development aid for health on health program performance: A conceptual framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 177-186.
    18. Oliveira Cruz, Valeria & McPake, Barbara, 2010. "The "aid contract" and its compensation scheme: A case study of the performance of the Ugandan health sector," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1357-1365, October.
    19. Pallas, Sarah Wood & Khuat, Thi Hai Oanh & Le, Quang Duong & Ruger, Jennifer Prah, 2015. "The changing donor landscape of health sector aid to Vietnam: A qualitative case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 165-172.
    20. Österreichische Forschungsstiftung für Internationale Entwicklung (ÖFSE) (ed.), 2006. "Österreichische Entwicklungspolitik 2005. Mehr Wirksamkeit in der EZA - Quantensprung oder Rhetorik?," Austrian Development Policy Report, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), number 268186.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:72007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.