IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diebps/32010.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

India: a new partner in democracy promotion?

Author

Listed:
  • Faust, Jörg
  • Wagner, Christian

Abstract

Unlike China and Russia, India is a democratic country, which could act as an important partner in international democracy promotion. Despite increasing requests from the United States and European governments, the promotion of democracy has not so far had a high priority in India’s foreign policy. Indian elites are concerned about losing their role as spokesmen for developing countries in global affairs if the country abandons the principle of non-intervention in favour of democracy promotion. As links between India and most fragile South Asian states are closely related to problems of nationand state-building, Indian foreign policy-makers fear that active democracy promotion could weaken the country’s regional position rather than strengthening it. Finally, there are concerns among political elites that active democracy promotion may backfire by triggering a domestic debate on the defects in Indian democracy–corruption and clientelism – as the main causes of social exclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Faust, Jörg & Wagner, Christian, 2010. "India: a new partner in democracy promotion?," Briefing Papers 3/2010, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diebps:32010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199649/1/die-bp-2010-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Destradi, Sandra, 2010. "A Regional Power Promoting Democracy? India's Involvement in Nepal (2005-2008)," GIGA Working Papers 138, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    2. Shiga, Hiroaki, 2016. "India’s Unique Role in the Enhancement of Democratic Governance as a Model of Constitutional Democracy," Working Papers 125, JICA Research Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diebps:32010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.