IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/daredp/1810.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Greening und Ökosystemleistungen: Über die Wirkung der ökologischen Vorrangfläche als privates oder öffentliches Gut

Author

Listed:
  • Lakner, Sebastian

Abstract

Der vorliegende Beitrag verfolgt drei Ziele: 1.) Die Darstellung der Umsetzung der ökologischen Vorrangfläche 2015, 2.) die Beschreibung der möglichen Ökosystemleistungen der ÖVF, und 3.) die Einordnung der Ökosystemleistungen als privates oder öffentliches Gut.

Suggested Citation

  • Lakner, Sebastian, 2018. "Greening und Ökosystemleistungen: Über die Wirkung der ökologischen Vorrangfläche als privates oder öffentliches Gut," DARE Discussion Papers 1810, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:daredp:1810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/190684/1/1043606343.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lakner, Sebastian & Schmitt, Jonas & Schüler, Stefan & Zinngrebe, Yves, 2016. "Naturschutzpolitik In Der Landwirtschaft: Erfahrungen Aus Der Umsetzung Von Greening Und Der Ökologischen Vorrangfläche 2015," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244768, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drittler, Lara & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2017. "Ausgestaltung der Ökologischen Vorrangflächen im Antragsjahr 2016: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse zur Entscheidung der Landwirte," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 262164, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Schüler, Stefan & Noack, Eva Maria, 2019. "Does the CAP reflect the population's concerns about agricultural landscapes? A qualitative study in Lower Saxony, Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 240-255.
    3. Kirsten Selbmann & Lydia Pforte, 2016. "Evaluation of Ecological Criteria of Biofuel Certification in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:daredp:1810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iagoede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.