IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cexpps/04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Source of healing or bone of contention? Trust in the German healthcare system during the coronavirus crisis
[Heilmittel oder Zankapfel? Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem während der Corona-Krise]

Author

Listed:
  • Busemeyer, Marius R.

Abstract

The persistent challenge posed by the coronavirus crisis raises questions concerning the efficiency and fairness of the German healthcare system. Based on new representative survey data, this paper examines what Germans think of the system’s general strength and fairness. Whereas trust in the system’s ability to avoid the unequal treatment of different groups of the population is high, people are more skeptical when it comes to its strength and efficiency. Political preferences play a role here, with supporters of the right-wing populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) much more skeptical than those supporting the center-right Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and the Green Party. Trust in the healthcare system and political trust, especially in the truthfulness of the federal government’s information policy, are closely linked. Information policy, therefore, plays a crucial role when it comes to securing public trust in the healthcare system.

Suggested Citation

  • Busemeyer, Marius R., 2020. "Source of healing or bone of contention? Trust in the German healthcare system during the coronavirus crisis [Heilmittel oder Zankapfel? Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem während der Corona-Krise]," Policy Papers 04, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cexpps:04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/232090/1/policy-paper-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cexpps:04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.exc.uni-konstanz.de/en/inequality/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.