Die Fehlbewertung durch das Stuttgarter Verfahren: eine Sensitivitätsanalyse der Werttreiber von Steuer- und Marktwerten
This paper focuses on firm valuation for tax purposes of non-listed company shares and its sensitivity towards different market conditions. Since the value of a private company cannot be observed on the stock market the value has to be estimated. Due to uncertainty, expected future profits may not serve as a tax base. Therefore, in Germany e.g., a tax value is derived on the basis of a combination of net assets and historic profits - the so called Stuttgart Method. A Discounted Cash Flow Model, as a generally accepted method of firm valuation, is used as a proxy for the market value. In this analysis a simulation quantifies the gap between both approaches for firms of six different industries. Thereby, we find out which industries are discriminated and which are subsidized by taxation. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the value gap with regard to the relevant value drivers (cost of capital, financial structure, corporate tax rates, growth, and timing effects) is investigated. In the basic setting the value is only 31,3% to 92,4% of the market value. Thus, tax values lead to a severe undervaluation of the company. Moreover, the span of the relations shows that the firms are treated unequally. Variations show that overvaluations are also likely to be observed. These results are helpful to design a true and fair tax base.
|Date of creation:||2007|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.arqus.info/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.