Do mandatory pensions decrease household savings? Evidence for the Netherlands
The Dutch mandatory pension system consists of two parts; a collective pay-as-you-go part which provides a minimum income to all Dutch inhabitants over age 64, and an occupation specific capital funded part which provides supplementary retirement income. Although the discretionary household savings in the Netherlands are high, the pension system might have a depressing effect. In this paper we test for the effect of mandatory pensions on discretionary household savings. The data are drawn from the CentER Panel, which consists of a representative and a highest-income-decile sample of the Dutch population. The panel contains rich information on household wealth, pension rights and savings attitudes. An empirical analysis gives that the impact of the collective part is not well identified. Better identified is the effect of the occupational pensions. They have a significant negative impact on savings motives with respect to old age. For the effect on household wealth, evidence is mixed; only for the highest-income-decile sample we find a significant negative impact of the occupational pensions.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||15 Mar 1999|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||Financial Support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (49) (0) 621-292-2547
Fax: (49) (0) 621-292-5594
Web page: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/
More information through EDIRC
Web page: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:99-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carsten Schmidt)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Carsten Schmidt to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.