IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/xrs/sfbmaa/99-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Was kann der Apfel von der Birne lernen, oder wozu brauchen Unternehmen Benchmarking?

Author

Listed:
  • Hegele, Cornelia

    (Lehrstuhl für ABWL und Organisaiton, Universität Mannheim)

  • Walgenbach, Peter

    (Lehrstuhl für ABWL und Organisation und Sonderforschungsbereich 504)

Abstract

The study deals with the question of why Benchmarking is experiencing such an overwhelming upswing. One possible explanation is presented, wherein Benchmarking is seen as a continuation and a further development of classic management theory. An analysis of the similarities and differences between Benchmarking and Taylor's concept of Scientific Management shows that Benchmarking is an attractive instrument for management. The analysis clarifies that Benchmarking's potential for rationalization is not only on the level of individual activities, as was the case with Taylor, but must be placed on a more abstract level. Benchmarking deals with whole processes and process chains. But despite the rationality that Benchmarking can be certified as a method, this is not enough to explain this concept's increasing spread plausibly. For example, it does not become clear what it is that motivates the (industry's) best to be available as a benchmark for other companies. A possible explanation for this behavior is that Benchmarking is a method for emulating price and quality competition, and that it can be used in this regard to increase employees' performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hegele, Cornelia & Walgenbach, Peter, 1999. "Was kann der Apfel von der Birne lernen, oder wozu brauchen Unternehmen Benchmarking?," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 99-09, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
  • Handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:99-09
    Note: Financial Support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:99-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carsten Schmidt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfmande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.