IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/xrs/sfbmaa/05-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Response Privacy and Elapsed Time Since Election Day as Determinants for Vote Overreporting

Author

Listed:
  • Stocké, Volker

    (Sonderforschungsbereich 504)

Abstract

Survey respondents have consistently been found to overreport their participation in political elections. Lots of research has been done about the sociodemographic correlates of vote overreporting, but only a few studies analyzed determinants which survey researchers have under their control in order to reduce the problem. Theoretical explanations have assumed memory failure and social desirability bias to explain overreporting. Taking these explanations as a starting point, we tested firstly whether asking retrospective questions about the participation in elections which date back longer in time leads to more overreporting. The second hypothesis is that ensured response privacy eliminates the need for positive self-presentation and thus reduces overreporting. Using data from a field experiment, we found that even when already a substantial time has elapsed between the election under consideration and the survey interview, increasing this time lag still increases the probability of vote reports. This was as well the case when the data was collected interviewer- rather than self-administered. Thus, conducting the survey interview as soon as possible after the political election and using an administration mode which ensures response privacy successfully reduces vote overreporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Stocké, Volker, 2005. "Response Privacy and Elapsed Time Since Election Day as Determinants for Vote Overreporting," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 05-42, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
  • Handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:05-42
    Note: Stimulating discussions with Hartmut Esser and Bob Belli are gratefully acknowledged. Tobias Stark and Diana Schirowski were of great help during the preparation of this manuscript. Financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 504, at the University of Mannheim, is gratefully acknowledged.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/publications/dp05-42.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:05-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carsten Schmidt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfmande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.