IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Präferenz für Intuition und Deliberation (PID):

  • Betsch, Cornelia

    ()

    (Sonderforschungsbereich 504)

Registered author(s):

    People differ in the way they make decisions: some people prefer intuitive, some reflective decision making (Epstein et al., 1996). To assess these individual differences, a new measure was constructed assessing the individual preference for deliberation and the preference for intuition on two independent scales. Intuition is understood as a purely affective mode, not as a heuristic-affective mode as assumed by Epstein. Deliberation is understood as a reflective, cognition-based mode. Three studies totalling more than 2500 participants report the construction, the test of dimensionality and the validity of the scale. Preference for intuition correlates positively with fast decision making, extraversion and agreeableness. It is independent from the ability of logical thinking. Preference for deliberation correlates with conscientiousness, perfectionism, need for structure and is as well independent from logical thinking. As affect plays an increasingly important role in the decision literature, the new measure can be a useful device to research the role of affect in decision making.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/publications/dp04-19.pdf
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Can't connect to www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de:80 (10060). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Carsten Schmidt)


    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim & Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim in its series Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications with number 04-19.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 51 pages
    Date of creation: 00 0000
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:04-19
    Note: Die Studien 1 und 3 in diesem Papier wurden finanziert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft im Rahmen des Sonderforschungsbereich 504 (�Rationalitätskonzepte, Entscheidungsverhalten und ökonomische Modellierung�). Die Mittel entstammen dem Teilprojekt A10 (Henning Plessner und Klaus Fiedler). Studie 2 wurde im Rahmen des Forschungsprojekts
    Contact details of provider: Postal: D-68131 Mannheim
    Phone: (49) (0) 621-292-2547
    Fax: (49) (0) 621-292-5594
    Web page: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    Web page: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de

    Order Information: Email:


    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:xrs:sfbmaa:04-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carsten Schmidt)

    The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Carsten Schmidt to update the entry or send us the correct address

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.