IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wuk/stafwp/996.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rewarding Performing Teachers? theory, evidence and UK policy

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Adnett

    ()

Abstract

The government's attempt to create a 'new professionalism' amongst British teachers has been accompanied by plans to extend performance related pay. The latter advocacy suggests the rejection of the co-operative/collegiate model of teacher remuneration and its replacement by one emphasising targeted incentives given the presence of incomplete employment contracts. This contract/agency approach recognises that performance pay is likely to generate dysfunctional behaviour, particularly in multi-tasked occupations such as teaching. The analysis of professional labour markets and nonprofits explains how the presence of asymmetric information and externalities provide a rationale for the widespread compliance by teachers to a code of professional ethics. This compliance is likely to be weakened by the extension of performance related pay. A decline in the 'old professionalism' necessitates the further extension of costly monitoring and regulation. This analysis, together with previous experience, suggests that performance pay will alter teacher behaviour and thus the composition of schooling outputs. The multi-tasked nature of a teacher's job, the incomplete nature of available performance indicators, the complex set of potential responses to incentive pay and the variety of Government proposals preclude more specific conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Adnett, "undated". "Rewarding Performing Teachers? theory, evidence and UK policy," Working Papers 996, Staffordshire University, Business School.
  • Handle: RePEc:wuk:stafwp:996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://ftp.repec.org/RePEc/wuk/stafwp/WP996.DOC
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Teachers' Pay; Incentive Pay; Economics of Personnel;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wuk:stafwp:996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (WoPEc Project). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.