Collective Bargaining Arrangements Closed Shops and Relative Pay
It is usually felt that workers in the union sector of the economy earn more than they would if they worked in the non-union sector ; and similarly that on average plants pay higher wages than comparable non-unionised plants. Recent evidence suggests that the average union/non-union ceteris paribus wage differential in Britain may in fact be quite small, but there is considerable variation around this average and that some groups of workers may obtain considerably larger differentials. Stewart (1983a) estimated a mean individual union membership differential for the manufacturing sector of around 8%, but found considerable variation with individual characteristics and across industries. Mulvey (1976), using aggregate industry-level data on coverage by collective agreements, found variation in the differential according to the level of bargaining and Geroski and Stewart (1986) found some evidence of difference in the differential according to the extend of coverage itself. The cumulated evidence clearly indicates that constancy of the diffential is not appropriate maintained hypothesis.
|Date of creation:||1986|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: CV4 7AL COVENTRY|
Phone: +44 (0) 2476 523202
Fax: +44 (0) 2476 523032
Web page: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Margaret Nash)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.