IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Conduct, Structure and Relative Welfare Losses in Quantity-Setting Duopoly

Listed author(s):
  • Cable, John
  • Carruth, Alan
  • Dixit, Avinash

Since the pioneering study of Harberger, monopoly welfare loss has received much attention in the literature. However, no attempt has been made explicitly to incorporate oligopolistic interaction. In this paper we postulate a specific social welfare function and solve directly for the level of welfare (net surplus) under various duopoly equilibria. Our approach departs from the long-standing tradition in industrial economics in which performance (profit) is explained by structure (concentration). We look directly at welfare, and concentration is found jointly with prices, outputs and profits as part of a solution determined by preferences, behaviour (conduct) and technology. Numerical analysis and computer graphics are employed to generate estimates of welfare loss under each pligopoly solution concept, relative to the social optimum, across plausible ranges of underlying cost and demand parameters.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by University of Warwick, Department of Economics in its series The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) with number 205.

in new window

Length: 26 pages
Date of creation: 1982
Handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:205
Contact details of provider: Postal:

Phone: +44 (0) 2476 523202
Fax: +44 (0) 2476 523032
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wrk:warwec:205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Margaret Nash)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.