Shareholders and employees: rent transfer and rent sharing in corporate takeovers
The introduction of the ideology of maximising shareholder value and the rise of institutional investors in LMEs contributed to the development of an active MCC, which threatens managers with replacement if they do not act in the best interests of shareholders. However, some authors argue that restructuring for shareholder value through the MCC may negatively affect labour (Froud et al., 2000; Lazonick and O'Sullivan, 2000). It is suggested that such corporate governance practices may discourage employees from investing in firm-specific human capital and may pressurise managers into taking short-term profit-maximising actions instead of investing in long-term sustainable projects (Blair, 1995).
|Date of creation:||Aug 2010|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Sally Baldwin Buildings, Block A, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD|
Fax: +44 1904 434163
Web page: http://www.york.ac.uk/management/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wrc:ymswp1:57(3). See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (White Rose Research Online)or (The York Management School)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.